Design Verification of Multi-Chiplet AI Accelerators: Challenges and Solutions

Authors

  • VenkataVaraha Chakravarthy Kanumetta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4357

Keywords:

Multi-Chiplet Verification, AI Accelerators, Heterogeneous Integration, Distributed Simulation, Chiplet Interconnects

Abstract

The verification of multi-chiplet AI accelerators represents one of the most formidable challenges in contemporary semiconductor design, driven by the industry's transition from monolithic architectures to heterogeneous integration strategies that combine multiple specialized dies within a single package. This paradigm shift addresses fundamental limitations in Moore's Law scaling by enabling the integration of chiplets fabricated on different process nodes, optimized for specific functions such as computation, memory management, and input-output operations. However, this architectural evolution introduces unprecedented verification complexity stemming from the integration of billions of transistors across multiple dies, each containing intricate intellectual property blocks and subsystems that must communicate through sophisticated die-to-die protocols. The verification process must address not only functional correctness but also critical non-functional properties, including thermal management across stacked dies, signal integrity through vertical interconnects, power delivery network integrity, and timing predictability across asynchronous clock domains. Traditional monolithic verification approaches prove inadequate for these distributed systems, necessitating advanced methodologies that combine hardware-accelerated emulation platforms, distributed simulation techniques employing virtual channels, formal verification methods for protocol compliance, and intelligent clock gating strategies. Despite these sophisticated approaches, significant challenges persist, including substantial infrastructure costs, extended debugging cycles for distributed simulations that can span days or weeks, a combinatorial explosion of the verification space, and the complexity of achieving adequate coverage across all chiplets and operating modes. The semiconductor industry is responding with innovative solutions, including hybrid verification frameworks that strategically combine multiple methodologies, standardized chiplet interfaces that enable reusable verification components, advanced debugging tools with unified cross-chiplet waveform databases, and emerging artificial intelligence-driven techniques for intelligent testbench generation, coverage closure prediction, and verification planning optimization. These developments, while promising enhanced productivity and effectiveness, underscore that successful multi-chiplet verification requires not only technological innovation but also substantial capital investment, specialized expertise, and close collaboration between design and verification teams to deliver high-quality, bug-free AI accelerators that meet stringent performance and reliability requirements.

References

[1] Andras Poppe et al., "Thermal Measurement and Modeling of Multi-Die Packages," July 2009. ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224386369_Thermal_Measurement_and_Modeling_of_Multi-Die_Packages

[2] Vivek Gujar et al., "Chiplet Technology Revolutionizing Semiconductor Design - A Review," February 2024, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378156097_Chiplet_Technology_Revolutionizing_Semiconductor_Design-A_Review

[3] Anthony Mastroianni et al., "Proposed Standardization of Heterogeneous Integrated Chiplet Models," October 2021. ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358325947_Proposed_Standardization_of_Heterogenous_Integrated_Chiplet_Models

[4] Samuel Pagliarini, "Verification methods, techniques, and processes for mixed-criticality applications on multi-core systems," April 2015, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339505204_Verification_methods_techniques_and_processes_for_mixed-criticality_applications_on_multi-core_systems

[5] Feng Yu et al., "A Novel Switch Architecture for Multi-Die Optimization with Efficient Connections," August 2024, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383110922_A_Novel_Switch_Architecture_for_Multi-Die_Optimization_with_Efficient_Connections

[6] Murali Krishna Reddy Mandalapu, "Emerging Chiplet-Based Architectures for Heterogeneous Integration," March 2025. ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389855062_Emerging_Chiplet-Based_Architectures_for_Heterogeneous_Integration

[7] Niranjana Ravishankar, "Verification Challenge in 3D Integrated Circuits IC Design," February 2020, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388763899_Verification_Challenge_in_3D_Integrated_Circuits_IC_Design

[8] Shenggao Li et al., "High-Bandwidth Chiplet Interconnects for Advanced Packaging Technologies in AI/ML Applications: Challenges and Solutions," January 2024, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386162569_High-Bandwidth_Chiplet_Interconnects_for_Advanced_Packaging_Technologies_in_AIML_Applications_Challenges_and_Solutions

[9] Ammar Mohammed & Ulrich Mohammed, "Multi-Agent Systems Modeling and Verification Using Hybrid Automata," May 2009, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48172941_Multi-Agent_Systems_Modeling_and_Verification_Using_Hybrid_Automata

[10] Puneet Gupta, "AI-Driven Chip Die Size Estimation: A Technical Framework," August 2025, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394294824_AI-Driven_Chip_Die_Size_Estimation_A_Technical_Framework

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

VenkataVaraha Chakravarthy Kanumetta. (2025). Design Verification of Multi-Chiplet AI Accelerators: Challenges and Solutions. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4357

Issue

Section

Research Article