Stress Testing Financial Systems– Simulating economic disruption using AI-driven risk models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.2132Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Machine learning, Risks, Economic changes, Geopolitics, Predictive analysisAbstract
The increasing interconnectedness and complexity of global financial markets have increased the stakes for advanced risk assessment methods. Traditional financial stress testing based on static rule-based models, historic datasets, and past crisis data which is poorly suited to address the nonlinear relationships and rapidly evolving risk factors characteristic of modern economies. This paper explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in financial stress testing with machine learning (ML), deep reinforcement learning (DRL), and generative AI to simulate systemic economic shocks and predict financial instability better. It also considers social media activities, geopolitical situations, climate change, pandemics, global financial markets, emerging technologies. This study provides a mechanized AI-based implementation plan for financial stress testing, data engineering pipeline profiling, model selection methodologies (LSTMs, GANs, and XGBoost), and real-time risk monitoring approaches. Financial institution case studies such as the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, and hedge funds such as BlackRock show how AI enhances prediction accuracy, reduces risk assessment cycles, and provides real-time financial crisis management approaches. In addition, this paper also opens up the prospects of Quantum AI, DeFi risk modeling, and digital twins powered by AI to revolutionize systemic risk analysis and crisis forecasting in finance. Our findings show that AI-powered financial stress tests are capable of significantly enhancing risk resilience, early warning, and global financial stability. Studies on XAI methods, audit architectures under regulatory directives, and the combination of quantum computing with AI-powered financial modeling for enhancing financial sector risk assessment even further is a direction that should be explored in future research.
References
[1] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2018). Stress testing principles. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d450.pdf
[2] Borio, C., Drehmann, M., & Tsatsaronis, K. (2014). Stress-testing macro stress testing: Does it live up to expectations? Journal of Financial Stability, 12, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.06.001
[3] Breuer, T., & Csiszár, I. (2013). Systematic stress tests with entropic plausibility constraints. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(5), 1552–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.04.013
[4] Dees, S., Henry, J., & Martin, R. (2017). STAMP€: Stress-Test Analytics for Macroprudential Purposes in the euro area. European Central Bank.
[5] Financial Stability Board. (2019). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services. https://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financial-service/
[6] Flood, M. D., & Korenko, G. G. (2015). Systematic scenario selection: Stress testing and the nature of uncertainty. Quantitative Finance, 15(1), 43–59.
[7] Gopinathan, R., & Bhaduri, S. N. (2021). Machine learning approaches to stress testing in banking: A systematic review. Risks, 9(6), 117.
[8] Greenwood, R., Landier, A., & Thesmar, D. (2015). Vulnerable banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(3), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.006
[9] Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09659
[10] Kapinos, P. S., Martin, C., & Mitnik, O. A. (2018). Stress testing banks: Whence and whither? Journal of Financial Perspectives, 5(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3154350
[11] Kou, G., Chao, X., Peng, Y., Alsaadi, F. E., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). Machine learning methods for systemic risk analysis in financial sectors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(5), 716–742. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.8740
[12] Malfait, J., & Wauters, M. (2022). AI-based climate risk assessment for financial institutions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 1094–1112.
[13] Philippon, T. (2021). Banking disrupted? Financial intermediation in an era of transformational technology. In The Future of Banking. CEPR Press. https://cepr.org/system/files/publication-files/60127-geneva_22_banking_disrupted_financial_intermediation_in_an_era_of_transformational_technology.pdf
[14] Schuermann, T. (2014). Stress testing banks. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(3), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.10.003
[15] Soramäki, K., & Cook, S. (2013). Algorithm-based monitoring of systemic financial risk. Journal of Network Theory in Finance, 1(1), 1–23.
[16] Wang, D., Chen, X., & Li, J. (2020). Explainable AI in financial risk management: Methods and challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102988
[17] Zhu, Q., & Cheng, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence in financial stress testing: Applications, challenges, and solutions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(4), 166.
[18] Federal Reserve Board. (2020). Supervisory scenarios for annual stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act stress testing rules and the capital plan rule. https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/2020-feb-supervisory-scenarios-for-annual-stress-tests.pdf
[19] Bolton, P., Kacperczyk, M., & Hong, H. (2022). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2–3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
[20] Ang, A., & Longstaff, F. A. (2013). Systemic sovereign credit risk: Lessons from the US and Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(5), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.04.009
[21] Jain, A. M. (2025). The role of predictive analytics in e-commerce conversion rate optimization. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.4.25
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.