Zero-Trust Data Architecture for Multi-Hospital Research: HIPAA-Compliant Unification of EHRs, Wearable Streams, and Clinical Trial Analytics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3477Keywords:
Zero-Trust Architecture, HIPAA Compliance, Healthcare Data Integration, Clinical Research Security, Interoperability in Multi-Hospital SystemsAbstract
Increasingly sophisticated clinical studies spanning multiple hospitals now require architectures that securely integrate Electronic Health Records, wearable device streams, and trial-related analytics. Legacy perimeter-based security, permitted by earlier data-sharing agreements, no longer meets the stringent privacy requirements imposed by HIPAA and similar regulations. In response, this article outlines a Zero-Trust Data Architecture designed explicitly for healthcare research. Its core policies—continuous verification, least-privilege provisioning, and micro-segmented networks—guard clinical data by ensuring that every requester can prove their identity before being permitted access to the narrowest, most relevant dataset. The presented architecture conforms to open standards, directly maps to NIST Special Publication 800-207, and incorporates tools such as the Open Policy Agent, cryptographically secured application programming interfaces, and cloud-native activity monitors. Usability and effectiveness are demonstrated in a simulation of three collaborating oncology centers that pooled information from multiple EHR vendors, streaming wearables, and an external trial management platform. Results show marked gains in early adverse-event flagging, patient follow-up, and cross-institution analytics, all accomplished within an audit trail that meets HIPAA safeguards. Additional sections address data-sample harmonization via the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources specification, ontology bridging to preserve clinical meaning, and pipeline encryption from source to storage. Residual obstacles—proprietary interfaces, variance in wearable metadata, and organizational inertia—are acknowledged but do not diminish the conclusion that the proposed ZTDA model advances secure, cooperative, and privacy-respecting research practice for contemporary health networks.
References
[1] Alam, M. F. P., Manongga, D. H. F., Sembiring, I., Sulistyo, W., & Wicaksono, F. D. N. (2024, July). Enhancing Government Hospital Information Security: A Framework Integrating Modified ISO 27001 and HIPAA Standards. In 2024 7th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS) (pp. 72-77). IEEE.
[2] Chavan, A. (2021). Eventual consistency vs. strong consistency: Making the right choice in microservices. International Journal of Software and Applications, 14(3), 45-56. https://ijsra.net/content/eventual-consistency-vs-strong-consistency-making-right-choice-microservices
[3] Chavan, A. (2024). Fault-tolerant event-driven systems: Techniques and best practices. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology, 6, E167. https://doi.org/10.47363/JEAST/2024(6)E167
[4] Chen, B., Wan, J., Shu, L., Li, P., Mukherjee, M., & Yin, B. (2017). Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges. Ieee Access, 6, 6505-6519. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682
[5] Chenthara, S., Ahmed, K., Wang, H., & Whittaker, F. (2019). Security and privacy-preserving challenges of e-health solutions in cloud computing. IEEE access, 7, 74361-74382. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919982
[6] Clark, L. T., Watkins, L., Piña, I. L., Elmer, M., Akinboboye, O., Gorham, M., ... & Regnante, J. M. (2019). Increasing diversity in clinical trials: overcoming critical barriers. Current problems in cardiology, 44(5), 148-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002
[7] Cunha, J., Ferreira, P., Castro, E. M., Oliveira, P. C., Nicolau, M. J., Núñez, I., ... & Serôdio, C. (2024). Enhancing Network Slicing Security: Machine Learning, Software-Defined Networking, and Network Functions Virtualization-Driven Strategies. Future Internet, 16(7), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16070226
[8] da Costa Assunção, L. M. (2016). A Model for Scientific Workflows with Parallel and Distributed Computing (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Portugal)).
[9] Dhanagari, M. R. (2024). MongoDB and data consistency: Bridging the gap between performance and reliability. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.21
[10] Dhanagari, M. R. (2024). Scaling with MongoDB: Solutions for handling big data in real-time. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(5), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.5.20
[11] Di Federico, G., & Barcaroli, F. (2022). Cloud Identity Patterns and Strategies: Design enterprise cloud identity models with OAuth 2.0 and Azure Active Directory. Packt Publishing Ltd.
[12] Engelhart, M. (2018). The nature and Basic Problems of compliance Regimes. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht, Forschungsgruppe" Architektur des Sicherheitsrechts"(ArchiS).
[13] Goel, G., & Bhramhabhatt, R. (2024). Dual sourcing strategies. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(2), 2155. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2155
[14] Haghani, M., Coughlan, M., Crabb, B., Dierickx, A., Feliciani, C., van Gelder, R., ... & Wilson, A. (2023). A roadmap for the future of crowd safety research and practice: Introducing the Swiss Cheese Model of Crowd Safety and the imperative of a Vision Zero target. Safety science, 168, 106292.
[15] He, Z. (2022). When data protection norms meet digital health technology: China’s regulatory approaches to health data protection. Computer Law & Security Review, 47, 105758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105758
[16] Hill, G., & MacArthur, J. (2022). Recognising a watershed moment: opportunities for clinical research nursing and midwifery. Journal of Research in Nursing, 27(1-2), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871221084160
[17] Holz, C., Kessler, T., Dugas, M., & Varghese, J. (2019). Core Data Elements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Unified Medical Language System–Based Semantic Analysis and Experts’ Review. JMIR Medical Informatics, 7(3), e13554. https://doi.org/10.2196/13554
[18] Joshi, H. (2024). Emerging Technologies Driving Zero Trust Maturity Across Industries. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2024.3505056
[19] Kang, G., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). Secure collaborative platform for health care research in an open environment: perspective on accountability in access control. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(10), e37978. https://doi.org/10.2196/37978
[20] Karwa, K. (2024). The future of work for industrial and product designers: Preparing students for AI and automation trends. Identifying the skills and knowledge that will be critical for future-proofing design careers. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 15(5). https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJARET/VOLUME_15_ISSUE_5/IJARET_15_05_011.pdf
[21] Konneru, N. M. K. (2021). Integrating security into CI/CD pipelines: A DevSecOps approach with SAST, DAST, and SCA tools. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. Retrieved from https://ijsra.net/content/role-notification-scheduling-improving-patient
[22] Kumar, A. (2019). The convergence of predictive analytics in driving business intelligence and enhancing DevOps efficiency. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, 6(6), 118-142. Retrieved from https://ijcem.in/wp-content/uploads/THE-CONVERGENCE-OF-PREDICTIVE-ANALYTICS-IN-DRIVING-BUSINESS-INTELLIGENCE-AND-ENHANCING-DEVOPS-EFFICIENCY.pdf
[23] Li, L., Pal, B., Ali, J., Sullivan, N., Chatterjee, R., & Ristenpart, T. (2019, November). Protocols for checking compromised credentials. Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1387–1403. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535.3354229
[24] Nyati, S. (2018). Revolutionizing LTL carrier operations: A comprehensive analysis of an algorithm-driven pickup and delivery dispatching solution. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(2), 1659-1666. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR24203183637
[25] Pulkka, S. (2023). The Modernization Process of a Data Pipeline.
[26] Raju, R. K. (2017). Dynamic memory inference network for natural language inference. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(2). https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i2/SR24926091431.pdf
[27] Raoof, M. M. (2024). United States Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights for NIST SP 800-66 Revision 2 from a Review of the NIST SP 800-66 Revision 1. Journal of Information Security, 15(2), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.4236/jis.2024.152014
[28] Retelny, D., Bernstein, M. S., & Valentine, M. A. (2017). No workflow can ever be enough: How crowdsourcing workflows constrain complex work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-23.
[29] Sardana, J. (2022). The role of notification scheduling in improving patient outcomes. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. Retrieved from https://ijsra.net/content/role-notification-scheduling-improving-patient
[30] Singh, V. (2022). Multimodal deep learning: Integrating text, vision, and sensor data: Developing models that can process and understand multiple data modalities simultaneously. International Journal of Research in Information Technology and Computing. https://romanpub.com/ijaetv4-1-2022.php
[31] Singh, V. (2023). Enhancing object detection with self-supervised learning: Improving object detection algorithms using unlabeled data through self-supervised techniques. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology. https://romanpub.com/resources/Vol%205%20%2C%20No%201%20-%2023.pdf
[32] Sukhadiya, J., Pandya, H., & Singh, V. (2018). Comparison of Image Captioning Methods. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH, 6(4), 43-48. https://rjwave.org/ijedr/papers/IJEDR1804011.pdf
[33] Tyler, D., & Viana, T. (2021). Trust no one? a framework for assisting healthcare organisations in transitioning to a zero-trust network architecture. Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7499. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167499
[34] Vijayan, V., Connolly, J. P., Condell, J., McKelvey, N., & Gardiner, P. (2021). Review of wearable devices and data collection considerations for connected health. Sensors, 21(16), 5589. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165589
[35] Walonoski, J., Hall, D., Bates, K. M., Farris, M. H., Dagher, J., Downs, M. E., ... & Russell, S. (2022). The “Coherent Data Set”: Combining patient data and imaging in a comprehensive, synthetic health record. Electronics, 11(8), 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11081199
[36] Yao, G. (2018). Secure fast handoff in IEEE 802.11-based wireless mesh networks.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.