Machine Learning for Proactive IPE Compliance: Predictive Analytics That Reduce Service Gaps by 30 Days
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3884Keywords:
IPE Compliance, Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, Vocational Rehabilitation, Service GapsAbstract
Prompt implementation of Individualized Plans for Employment (IPEs) is crucial for guaranteeing that individuals with disabilities have continuous and efficient vocational rehabilitation assistance. Prolonged IPE development and approval may result in service interruptions, diminished customer involvement, and failure to adhere to federally specified deadlines. This study examines the use of machine learning (ML) models to proactively detect and address potential service deficiencies in Individualized Plan for Employment (IPE) timelines inside state rehabilitation agencies. Employing an extensive dataset of historical case management records, we constructed and tested classification and time-series forecasting models designed to identify early risk indicators for IPE delays. The classification model had superior predictive accuracy, with an F1-score of 0.82, whilst the forecasting model offered 30-day advance alerts regarding prospective non-compliance incidents. These predicted insights allowed counselors and administrative teams to intervene earlier, therefore decreasing the average duration of service gaps by 30 days. The paper delineates the structure of an AI-driven compliance monitoring framework that may be assimilated with current state workforce and case management systems, such as AWARE and other Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) platforms. This scalable system utilizes predictive analytics to automate risk identification, prioritize caseloads, and facilitate data-driven decision-making for enhancements in service delivery. This research enhances the existing knowledge on AI applications in public sector human services and illustrates the potential of machine learning-driven early warning systems to improve operational compliance, client outcomes, and timely access to vocational rehabilitation programs for individuals with disabilities.
References
[1] American Institutes for Research. (2024). AI Applications in Human Services: Trends and Challenges. Washington, DC: AIR Press.
[2] Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[3] Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
[4] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2022). Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov
[5] Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16, 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953
[6] Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
[7] Government Accountability Office. (2024). State Vocational Rehabilitation Programs: Performance and Compliance Trends. GAO-24-123. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office.
[8] HHS Office of Inspector General. (2025). IPE Timeliness Audit Report: Risk Areas for State VR Agencies. OIG Publication No. 25-4567.
[9] Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and Practice (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: OTexts.
[10] Johnson, L., & Patel, S. (2025). Predictive Risk Modeling in Public Case Management Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. Public Administration Review, 85(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13312
[11] Lee, D., & Martinez, R. (2025). Machine Learning in Social Program Compliance: A Review of Emerging Trends. Government Information Quarterly, 42(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.101773
[12] National Council on Disability. (2024). Access Delayed: A Review of Vocational Rehabilitation Service Timeliness. Washington, DC: NCD.
[13] Office of Management and Budget. (2020). Federal Data Strategy Action Plan 2020. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
[14] Smith, J., Rogers, A., & Huang, T. (2025). Service Gaps and Employment Outcomes in State VR Programs: A Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 52(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-240054
[15] Thomas, K., Nguyen, P., & Wilson, M. (2025). Cross-Domain Predictive Analytics in Public Service Delivery: Insights from Health and Human Services. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10231-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
