Comparison of Treatment Planning Systems with Monte Carlo Simulation Under Conditions of Tissue Inhomogeneities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4006Keywords:
Monte Carlo simulation, EGSnrc/BEAMnrc code, Treatment Planning Systems, Tissue Inhomogeneities, Slab phantomAbstract
This study aimed to validate a Monte Carlo (MC) beam model of a 6-MV Elekta Synergy MLCi linac and benchmark two different treatment planning systems (TPSs) employing pencil-beam (PB) and collapsed-cone convolution/superposition (CCC) algorithms against MC in heterogeneous slab phantoms. The initial electron energy was optimized by χ² analysis of water-phantom PDDs and lateral profiles for a 10×10 cm2 field (5.4–6.6 MeV); 5.8 MeV minimized χ² and was adopted. Agreement with measurement was verified using percent depth dose curves, lateral dose profiles, TPR20,10 and output factors. Dose distributions of 3×3, 10×10 and 20×20 cm2 open fields in lung-, bone- and water-equivalent virtual slab phantoms were then calculated using both TPSs and MC. MC calculations were performed in two modes: one yielding dose-to-medium (MCDm) and the other yielding dose-to-water (MCDw). At 5.8 MeV, measurements versus MC comparisons showed <0.5% differences for PDDs (≤20×20 cm²), ~1% for lateral profiles (outside high-gradient regions), TPR20,10 <0.2% and ~1% for output factors. In the lung phantom and 3×3 cm2 field, PDD differences of up to 10% were observed between TPSPB and MCDw, whereas the corresponding difference for TPSCCC was 4.5%. The differences were smaller in the other phantoms. In the dose profile comparisons, particularly at the field edges, discrepancies of up to 14% were observed. In conclusion, the MC model demonstrated a high level of agreement with measurements. TPSCCC calculations were closer to those by MCDw than TPSPB.
References
[1] Chetty, I. J., Curran, B., Cygler, J. E., DeMarco, J. J., Ezzell, G., Faddegon, B. A., et al. (2007). Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Medical Physics, 34(12):4818–4853.
[2] Ma, C.-M., Mok, E., Kapur, A., Pawlicki, T., Findley, D., Brain, S., et al. (1999). Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system. Medical Physics, 26(10):2133–2143.
[3] Reynaert, N., Van der Marck, S. C., Schaart, D. R., Van der Zee, W., Van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, C., Tomsej, M., et al. (2007). Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 76(4):643–686.
[4] Vanderstraeten, B., Reynaert, N., Paelinck, L., Madani, I., De Wagter, C., De Gersem, W., et al. (2006). Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations. Medical Physics, 33(9):3149–3158.
[5] Verhaegen, F., & Seuntjens, J. (2003). Monte Carlo modelling of external radiotherapy photon beams. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 48(21):R107–R164.
[6] Siebers, J. V., Keall, P. J., Nahum, A. E., & Mohan, R. (2000). Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 45(4):983–995.
[7] Rogers, D. W. O., Faddegon, B. A., Ding, G. X., Ma, C.-M., We, J., & Mackie, T. R. (1995). BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Medical Physics, 22(5):503–524.
[8] Kawrakow, I. (2000). Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport: I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. Medical Physics, 27(3):485–498.
[9] Kawrakow, I., & Walters, B. R. B. (2006). Efficient photon beam dose calculations using DOSXYZnrc with BEAMnrc. Medical Physics, 33(8):3046–3056.
[10] Kawrakow, I., Rogers, D. W. O., & Walters, B. R. B. (2004). Large efficiency improvements in BEAMnrc using directional bremsstrahlung splitting. Medical Physics, 31(10):2883–2898.
[11] Sheikh-Bagheri, D., & Rogers, D. W. O. (2002). Sensitivity of megavoltage photon beam Monte Carlo simulations to electron beam and other parameters. Medical Physics, 29(3):379–390.
[12] Rogers, D. W. O., Walters, B. R. B., & Kawrakow, I. (2009). BEAMnrc user’s manual (NRCC Report PIRS-509(A) revL). National Research Council of Canada.
[13] Spezi, E., Lewis, D. G., & Smith, C. W. (2002). A DICOM-RT-based toolbox for the evaluation and verification of radiotherapy plans. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47(21):4223–4232.
[14] Deasy, J. O., Blanco, A. I., & Clark, V. H. (2003). CERR: A computational environment for radiotherapy research. Medical Physics, 30(5):979–985.
[15] Toklu, T. (2016). Use of Monte Carlo techniques in external beam therapy of lung cancer [Doctoral dissertation, Yeditepe University]. Yeditepe University Library.
[16] Van Dyk, J., Barnett, R. B., Cygler, J. E., & Shragge, P. C. (1993). Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 26(2):261–273.
[17] Kawrakow, I., Fippel, M., & Friedrich, K. (1996). 3D electron dose calculation using a voxel based Monte Carlo algorithm (VMC). Medical Physics, 23(4):445–457.
[18] Walters, B. R. B., Kawrakow, I., & Rogers, D. W. O. (2009). DOSXYZnrc user’s manual (Report No. PIRS-794 RevB). National Research Council of Canada.
[19] Haryanto, F., Fippel, M., Laub, W., Dohm, O., & Nüsslin, F. (2002). Investigation of photon beam output factors for conformal radiation therapy—Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 47(9):N133–N143.
[20] Scott, A. J., Nahum, A. E., & Fenwick, J. D. (2008). Using a Monte Carlo model to predict dosimetric properties of small radiotherapy photon fields. Medical Physics, 35(10):4671–4684.
[21] Heydarian, M., Hobany, P. W., & Beddoe, A. H. (1996). A comparison of dosimetry techniques in stereotactic radiosurgery. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 41(1):93–110.
[22] Disher, B., Hajdok, G., Gaede, S., & Battista, J. J. (2012). An in-depth Monte Carlo study of lateral electron disequilibrium for small fields in ultra-low density lung: Implications for modern radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 57(6):1543–1559.
[23] Fogliata, A., Vanetti, E., Albers, D., Brink, C., Clivio, A., Knöös, T., Nicolini, G., & Cozzi, L. (2007). On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: Comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 52(5):1363–1385.
[24] Reynaert, N., Van der Marck, S. C., Schaart, D. R., Van der Zee, W., Van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, C., Tomsej, M., Jansen, J., Heijmen, B., Coghe, M., & De Wagter, C. (2007). Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 76(4):643–686.
[25] Carrasco, P., Jornet, N., Duch, M. A., Weber, L., Ginjaume, M., Eudaldo, T., Jurado, D., Ruiz, A., & Ribas, M. (2004). Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium. Medical Physics, 31(11):2899–2911.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
