Multi objective optimization of existing buildings: “A Study of a Higher Educational Laboratory in Cairo, Egypt”

Authors

  • Tahany Ahmed Abd El-Mawgood
  • Hinar Abo El-Maged Ahmed
  • Hisham Sameh Hussein Sameh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4162

Keywords:

Multi objective optimization, Genetic Algorithms, Energy Efficiency, Higher Education Buildings, Laboratories

Abstract

This research presents a comprehensive methodology for optimizing building performance in the context of visual and thermal comfort of a computer laboratory in higher educational buildings in hot dry climates, focuses on minimizing energy use intensity (EUI) and maximizing annual thermal comfort ratio and daylighting through maximizing useful daylighting illumination (UDI) and spatial daylighting Autonomy (sDA). This study conducts a parametric optimization approach of building envelope openings and materials to integrate multi-objective optimization (MOO), aiming to explore and find optimal solutions for improving the laboratory's overall performance. Throughout Rhino Grasshopper platform for simulation purpose. The methodology begins with the development of a parametric model of the computer laboratory, which allows for the manipulation of key design variables, including window size, Window wall ratio (WWR) orientation, shading devices, wall materials and properties, glazing types. These variables are used as design parameters   linked to performance metrics that capture the visual comfort (via daylighting analysis), thermal comfort (evaluating indoor temperature variations and HVAC loads), and EUI (calculated through energy simulation). The design space is explored using multi-objective optimization by Genetic algorithms NSGAII with Wallacie solver, which balance trade-offs between the 124 key design parameters to enhance five objective functions performance criteria. The results show that significant improvements can be achieved in the computer laboratory’s visual and thermal comfort, while simultaneously reducing energy use intensity by around 2.35% maximizing (sDA) and (UDI) to 1.3%, maximizing annual thermal comfort ratio (ATCR) to 1.9%.  The optimized solutions exhibit a balance between natural and artificial lighting, effective thermal insulation, and strategic shading. In some cases, up to a 26% reduction in energy consumption (EUI) is observed, with notable improvements in both daylight quality and occupant thermal satisfaction.

References

Kabiri, E., & Maftouni, N. (2024). Multiple objective energy optimization of a trade center building based on genetic algorithm using ecological materials. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 9366.‏

Savvides, A., Michael, A., Vassiliades, C., Parpa, D., Triantafyllidou, E., & Englezou, M. (2023). An examination of the design for a prefabricated housing unit in Cyprus in terms of energy, daylighting and cost. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 12611.‏

Niazy, D., Metwally, E. A., Rifat, M., Awad, M. I., & Elsabbagh, A. (2023). A conceptual design of circular adaptive façade module for reuse. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20552.‏

Son, P. V. H., & Huyen, V. T. B. (2023). Optimizing daylight in west-facing facades for LEED V4. 1 compliance using metaheuristic approach. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 21942.‏

Seddik Hassan, A. M., Abd El Aal, R. F. A., Fahmi, A. A. E., Ali, S. M. A., & Abdelhady, M. I. (2024). Courtyard geometry’s effect on energy consumption of AlKharga city residential buildings, Egypt. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 11149.‏

Khalil, A. (2023, September). Design Optimization of Building Form and Fenestration for Daylighting and Thermal Energy in Three Variations of the Hot Climate of Egypt. In Building Simulation 2023 (Vol. 18, pp. 2267-2275). IBPSA.‏

Khalil, A., Lila, A. M. H., & Ashraf, N. (2023). Optimization and prediction of different building forms for thermal energy performance in the hot climate of Cairo using genetic algorithm and machine learning. Computation, 11(10), 192.‏

Khoshbakht, M., Gou, Z., & Dupre, K. (2018). Energy use characteristics and benchmarking for higher education buildings. Energy and Buildings, 164, 61-76.‏

Safwat, H., Abdel-Rehim, A. A., El-Mahallawi, I., Hussein, A. A., Amer, A. M., Elshazly, E., & Elshamy, A. I. (2024). Guidelines for data collection on energy performance of higher-education buildings in Egypt: a case study. HBRC Journal, 20(1), 615-642.‏

Makki, M., & Song, Y. (2019). Wallacei Primer 2.0. Retrieved from https://www.wallacei.com

Nicol, F., Humphreys, M., & Roaf, S. (2012). Adaptive thermal comfort: principles and practice. Routledge.‏

Gibson, I. (2014). Adaptive thermal comfort: principles and practice.‏

Ford, B., Schiano-Phan, R., & Vallejo, J. A. (2019). The architecture of natural cooling. Routledge.‏

Chaube, A., Benyoucef, L., & Tiwari, M. K. (2012). An adapted NSGA-2 algorithm based dynamic process plan generation for a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4), 1141-1155.‏

Arthur, D., Manthey, B., & Röglin, H. (2011). Smoothed analysis of the k-means method. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 58(5), 1-31.

CIBSE. (2015). Symposium past papers and case studies archive: 2015 papers. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. Retrieved from https://www.cibse.org/whats-on/cibse-technical-symposium/symposium-past-papers-and-case-studies-archive/2015-papers/

Reinhart, C. F., & Walkenhorst, O. (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and buildings, 33(7), 683-697.‏

Nabil, A., & Mardaljevic, J. (2005). Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Research & Technology, 37(1), 41-57.‏

Fang, Y. (2017). Optimization of daylighting and energy performance using parametric design, simulation modeling, and genetic algorithms.‏

Abdin, A. R., El Bakery, A. R., & Mohamed, M. A. (2018). The role of nanotechnology in improving the efficiency of energy use with a special reference to glass treated with nanotechnology in office buildings. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 2671-2682.‏

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Tahany Ahmed Abd El-Mawgood, Hinar Abo El-Maged Ahmed, & Hisham Sameh Hussein Sameh. (2025). Multi objective optimization of existing buildings: “A Study of a Higher Educational Laboratory in Cairo, Egypt”. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4162

Issue

Section

Research Article