Metadata-Centric Orchestration for Cloud-Native ETL Pipelines

Authors

  • Anshul Verma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4292

Keywords:

Metadata-Centric Orchestration, Cloud-Native ETL Pipelines, Dynamic Execution Planning, Data Lineage Tracking, Schema Governance, Distributed Data Processing

Abstract

Cloud-native data environments running on distributed architectures are severely challenged when classic Extract-Transform-Load orchestration patterns depend on static Directed Acyclic Graph structures, which do not support dynamic data dependencies, schema change, and heterogeneous source system integration. Contemporary data platforms handling data from hundreds of heterogeneous sources are burdened with increasing operational complexity as pipeline logic hard-coded in applications forms maintenance bottlenecks and governance hurdles. The metadata-driven orchestration pattern overcomes these limitations by decoupling control logic from application code into versioned metadata stores that act as centralized sources of truth for pipeline specifications. Everything configurable, such as source connections, transformation rules, data quality constraints, dependency relationships, and lineage mappings, gets declaratively defined through structured metadata schemas independent of the execution fabric. Orchestration engines query metadata repositories at runtime to build dynamic execution plans sensitive to real-time system conditions and upstream data availability trends. Technology deployments use Apache Airflow as a task orchestrator, dbt framework as an SQL-based transformer, and OpenLineage standards for end-to-end lineage tracking across distributed processing environments. The metadata layer also serves as an observability and governance platform that supports end-to-end traceability, reproducibility, and impact analysis during workflow execution. Empirical implementations in multi-tenant data platforms illustrate dramatic decreases in pipeline maintenance overhead and faster recovery from schema drift events. Cross-functional coordination is greatly enhanced as abstraction of metadata separates transformation logic from infrastructure code, allowing business rules to be defined by data analysts without requiring proficiency in intricately complex orchestration frameworks. Metadata-based orchestration lays grounding capabilities towards self-adaptive data pipelines, combining data engineering, governance, and observability under concerted architectural frameworks.

References

[1] Sarah James and Alan D. Duncan, "Over 100 Data and Analytics Predictions Through 2028," Gartner, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mediahuis.ie/app/uploads/2024/05/over-100-data-and-analytics-predictions-through-2028-1-2.pdf

[2] Indrakumari Ranganathan et al., "The growing role of integrated and insightful big and real-time data analytics platforms," ResearchGate, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Indrakumari-Ranganathan/publication/338316751_The_growing_role_of_Internet_of_Things_in_healthcare_wearables/links/5f036a48299bf1881603c8e3/The-growing-role-of-Internet-of-Things-in-healthcare-wearables.pdf

[3]Pegdwend´e Sawadogo and J´erˆome Darmont, "On Data Lake Architectures and Metadata Management," arXiv, 2021. [Online]. Available https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.11152

[4] CHANGQING JI et al., "BIG DATA PROCESSING: BIG CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES," Journal of Interconnection Networks, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Uchechukwu-Awada/publication/236263585_Big_data_processing_Big_challenges/links/0deec52030e49cf648000000/Big-data-processing-Big-challenges.pdf

[5] MATEI ZAHARIA et al., "Apache Spark: A Unified Engine for Big Data Processing," Communications of the ACM, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2934664

[6] M. R. Kogalovsky, "Ontology-Based Data Access Systems," Programming and Computer Software, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/70566894/s036176881204003220210929-20208-cj4a64-libre.pdf?1636163528=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DOntology_based_data_access_systems.pdf&Expires=1761544628&Signature=bsl85ih9tmiMqEc66TFnK~Ir33DNjoGvrArlXHR~HGZI0M4lNd4SxYqLjEsQa1ToclpDZ8xpqKRfoa3bBvHgnrRHPemrifYTJMr6tmispztHiZpcTSpfBP3MQHitEgfDnM9b0ZlOfC8w~0FGeMPqCi8I30ItQPP1QWLzs76W00kBJfmxlAlrFvGnvJ4azQRu9gTnTBBKvRL7pYu2P7Iq7GovYpiExJNN5seRVHe8Lh3opOyHGNHPXa4l3RNP-H7of7MwJlj6Rer523b2TtehWEAU-zhQtbWNbtQv-UfZxIhtYlBDQaPjBne5b~EUtl9Qmige1JR6E-Ho3AcL2iqs8g__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

[7] Pedro Las-Casas et al., "Sifter: Scalable Sampling for Distributed Traces, without Feature Engineering," ACM, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3357223.3362736

[8] Thulara N. Hewage et al., "Review: Big Data Techniques of Google, Amazon, Facebook and Twitter," Journal of Communications, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Malka-Halgamuge/publication/323588192_Review_Big_Data_Techniques_of_Google_Amazon_Facebook_and_Twitter/links/5b89eddf4585151fd1403fa3/Review-Big-Data-Techniques-of-Google-Amazon-Facebook-and-Twitter.pdf

[9] Hui Yie Teh et al., "Sensor data quality: a systematic review," SpringerOpen, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40537-020-0285-1.pdf

[10] HUI JIANG et al., "Energy Big Data: A Survey," IEEE Access, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7548112

Downloads

Published

2025-11-13

How to Cite

Anshul Verma. (2025). Metadata-Centric Orchestration for Cloud-Native ETL Pipelines. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4292

Issue

Section

Research Article