Autonomous Multi-Zone Replication for Zero-Loss Settlement Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4817Keywords:
Autonomous Replication, Zero-Loss Settlement Systems, Multi-Zone Infrastructure, Hybrid-Cloud Architecture, Distributed ConsistencyAbstract
Contemporary financial settlement infrastructures demand absolute data integrity across multi-zone and hybrid-cloud environments, where traditional replication strategies fail under real-world operational volatility. Zero-loss settlement systems—including national clearing networks, real-time payment rails, and high-frequency transactional platforms—face unprecedented challenges from network jitter, availability zone drift, asymmetric latency profiles, and heterogeneous infrastructure performance. Autonomous replication architectures emerge as the essential foundation for maintaining correctness guarantees in distributed financial ecosystems. These intelligent systems continuously optimize replication paths, enforce zero-loss commit governance, detect divergence through multidimensional consistency monitoring, and orchestrate sophisticated failover mechanisms. The convergence of software-defined networking paradigms, adaptive transport selection, and predictive analytics enables replication substrates to operate as self-optimizing systems aware of workload patterns, environmental risks, and latent failure conditions. Achieving external consistency at a global scale requires sophisticated timestamp management, distributed commit protocols, and dynamic adjustment of consistency levels based on application requirements. The architectural evolution toward autonomous replication represents a fundamental prerequisite for next-generation settlement infrastructure capable of operating at a planetary scale while preserving absolute correctness guarantees across expansive, heterogeneous operational environments.
References
[1] Ponemon Institute, "Cost of Data Center Outages," Ponemon Institute Research Report, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.ponemon.org/local/upload/file/2011%20Cost_of_Data_Center_Outages.pdf
[2] Matei Zaharia, et al., "Discretized streams: Fault-tolerant streaming computation at scale," ACM Digital Library, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2517349.2522737
[3] Ben Zhang, et al., "AWStream: Adaptive wide-area streaming analytics," ResearchGate, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326907632_AWStream_adaptive_wide-area_streaming_analytics
[4] Anuj Kalia et al., "Datacenter RPCs can be general and fast," ACM Digital Library, 2019. [Online]. Available: ://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3323234.3323236
[5] Hong Xu; Baochun Li, "RepFlow: Minimizing flow completion times with replicated flows in data centers," IEEE, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6848094
[6] Yuan Zhang, et al., "A survey on software defined networking with multiple controllers," ScienceDirect, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1084804517303934
[7] Dan R. K. Ports, et al., "Designing distributed systems using approximate synchrony in data center networks," ACM Digital Library, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2789770.2789774
[8] J. C. Corbett et al., "Spanner: Google's globally distributed database," ACM Digital Library, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2491245
[9] Peter Bailis, et al., "Bolt-on causal consistency," ResearchGate, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262353397_Bolt-on_causal_consistency
[10] Cheng Li et al., "Making geo-replicated systems fast as possible, consistent when necessary," ACM Digital Library, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2387880.2387906
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.