An Adaptive Governance-Centric MLOps Framework for Risk-Tiered Control and Continuous Assurance of Responsible AI in High-Stakes Domains

Authors

  • Sunilkumar Reddy Eraganeni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5340

Keywords:

MLOps, Responsible AI, Governance Framework, Explainability, Fairness, EU AI Act

Abstract

The rapid adoption of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models in high-stakes domains such as financial credit assessment, healthcare, and critical infrastructure necessitates governance frameworks beyond conventional MLOps practices. Existing approaches focus primarily on operational efficiency while lacking integrated support for regulatory compliance, explainability, and fairness, which are critical under emerging regulations such as the EU AI Act and GDPR. This study proposes an Adaptive Governance-Centric MLOps Framework that embeds responsible AI principles through a layered, risk-tiered architecture. The framework introduces a dedicated Governance and Compliance Layer consisting of a Risk Tier Engine, Policy Enforcement Engine, Explainability (XAI) Module, Fairness and Bias Checker, and Audit and Logging component. These modules operate across all stages of the ML lifecycle, supported by a continuous feedback loop for ongoing governance enforcement. The framework is validated on the Statlog German Credit Dataset using six models spanning ML and DL paradigms, evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation with ANOVA and pairwise t-test analysis. Results show that XGBoost achieves the highest predictive performance with an accuracy of 94.57 percent and AUC of 95.62 percent, while the MLP model demonstrates superior governance compliance by satisfying strict fairness thresholds. Additionally, drift detection experiments confirm that the framework effectively identifies distributional shifts and triggers retraining, ensuring continuous compliance. The findings demonstrate that governance enforcement can be integrated without compromising predictive performance, enabling a unified approach to achieving accuracy, fairness, and regulatory compliance in high-stakes AI systems.

References

[1] Goncalves, A. and Correia, A., 2026. XAI-Compliance-by-Design: A Modular Framework for GDPR-and AI Act-Aligned Decision Transparency in High-Risk AI Systems. Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy, 6(2), p.43.

[2] Shubina, V., Ranti, T., Juppo, A. and Mäkilä, T., 2025, November. Engineering Data Architectures for AI/ML Integration in Regulated Manufacturing. In International Conference on Software Business (pp. 41-57). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

[3] Kumar, G., Kumari, R., Shukla, A., Yadav, A.P.S., Verma, R. and Gaur, J., 2025, November. Regulatory Frameworks and Ethical Governance of Neural Networks in Computer Science Applications. In 2025 IEEE 3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cybersecurity (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

[4] Avuthu, Y.R., 2021. Trustworthy AI in Cloud MLOps: Ensuring Explainability, Fairness, and Security in AI-Driven Applications. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 8(1), pp.246-255.

[5] Mangala, N., 2026. Responsible AI Data Architecture: Embedding GDPR and PII Compliance into MLOps Pipelines at Enterprise Scale. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), pp.107-124.

[6] Mateo-Casalí, M.Á., Boza, A. and Fraile, F., 2026. Towards a Reference Architecture for Machine Learning Operations. Computers, 15(4), p.218.

[7] Zhang, X., Zhao, P., Jaskolka, J., Li, H. and Lu, R., 2026. SecMLOps: A comprehensive framework for integrating security throughout the machine learning operations lifecycle. Empirical Software Engineering, 31(3), p.74.

[8] Raheem, M., Eltazi, N., Papazoglou, M., Krämer, B. and Elgammal, A., 2026, February. A Model-Driven Engineering Approach to AI-Powered Healthcare Platforms. In Informatics (Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 32). MDPI.

[9] Vyhmeister, E. and G Castane, G., 2026. When Industry meets trustworthy AI: a systematic review of AI for Industry 5.0. AI and Ethics, 6(2), p.200.

[10] Aguilar, R.M., Alayón, S., Torres, J.M. and Martín, C.A., 2026. Data-centric AI governance for responsible organizational value: evidence from a European public administration. AI & SOCIETY, pp.1-13.

[11] Fotia, L., Gaeta, R., Messina, F., Rosaci, D. and Sarné, G.M., 2026. Artificial Intelligence for High-Availability Systems: A Comprehensive Review. Computers, 15(4), p.231.

[12] Idziak, E., Çiçekli, U.G. and Kocamaz, M., 2026. Machine Learning in Infrastructure Financial Decision-Making for Sustainable Governance. Infrastructure Finance and Sustainable Governance, pp.73-102.

[13] Borges, J., 2026. Clinical Artificial Intelligence as a Sociotechnical System: Structural Failure Modes and Governance Requirements. Available at SSRN.

[14] Ferenci, S., Coteț, F.A., Lakatos, E.S., Munteanu, R.A. and Szabó, L., 2026. Artificial intelligence in local energy systems: A perspective on emerging trends and sustainable innovation. Energies, 19(2), p.476.

[15] Pluskota, P., Słupińska, K., Wawrzyniak, A. and Wąsikowska, B., 2026. The Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Implementation of ESG-Oriented Sustainable Development Strategies in the Banking Sector: A Case Study. Sustainability, 18(2), p.732.

[16] Kamisetty, A., 2026. Continuous Model Adaptation in Distributed Healthcare Systems: A MLOps Framework for Federated Learning in Multi-Institutional Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology, pp.1-5.

[17] Bachinger, F., Kronberger, G. and Affenzeller, M., 2021. Continuous improvement and adaptation of predictive models in smart manufacturing and model management. IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing, 3(1), pp.48-63.

[18] Karamitsos, I., Thabit, S. and Apostolopoulos, C., 2020. Applying DevOps practices of continuous automation for machine learning. Information, 11(7), p.363.

[19] Nagaraj, P.B., Chaluvadi, A., Vallu, V.R., Pulakhandam, W. and Padmavathy, R., 2026. Automated Machine Learning Model Management: Integrating Monitoring, ML Observability, and Continuous Feedback for Enhanced Performance. In AI-Based Data Mobility and Intelligent Modeling for Smart Cities (pp. 291-328). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

[20] Carnero, A., Martín, C., Jeon, G. and Díaz, M., 2024. Online learning and continuous model upgrading with data streams through the Kafka-ML framework. Future Generation Computer Systems, 160, pp.251-263.

[21] Studer, S., Bui, T.B., Drescher, C., Hanuschkin, A., Winkler, L., Peters, S. and Müller, K.R., 2021. Towards CRISP-ML (Q): a machine learning process model with quality assurance methodology. Machine learning and knowledge extraction, 3(2), pp.392-413.

[22] Stirbu, V., Granlund, T. and Mikkonen, T., 2023. Continuous design control for machine learning in certified medical systems. Software Quality Journal, 31(2), pp.307-333.

[23] Tran, T.A., Ruppert, T. and Abonyi, J., 2024. The use of explainable artificial intelligence and machine learning operation principles to support the continuous development of machine learning-based solutions in fault detection and identification. Computers, 13(10), p.252.

[24] Baylor, D., Breck, E., Cheng, H.T., Fiedel, N., Foo, C.Y., Haque, Z., Haykal, S., Ispir, M., Jain, V., Koc, L. and Koo, C.Y., 2017, August. Tfx: A tensorflow-based production-scale machine learning platform. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1387-1395).

[25] Singh, D.S., 2025. Observability for AI Systems: Tracing, Drift, and SLAs. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 8(2), pp.11952-11955.

[26] Nascimento, D.A., 2023. Intelligent Observability in Cloud-Native Enterprise Applications through Predictive Performance and Causal Trace Mining with Secure AI and ML Pipelines. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 5(2), pp.6307-6313.

[27] Bukhari, T.T., Oladimeji, O., Etim, E.D. and Ajayi, J.O., 2024. Advances in End-to-End Pipeline Observability for Data Quality Assurance in Complex Analytics Systems. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(4), pp.1465-1487.

[28] VENKATARAMAN, M., MENON, K. and SENAPATI, A., 2026. Enhancing Software Delivery Performance through AI-Driven Observability and Intelligent Automation. International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering Innovations, 2(1), pp.52-59.

[29] Boch, A., Hohma, E. and Trauth, R., 2022. Towards an accountability framework for AI: Ethical and legal considerations. Institute for Ethics in AI, Technical University of Munich: Munich, Germany.

[30] Puchakayala, P.R., 2022. Responsible AI Ensuring Ethical, Transparent, and Accountable Artificial Intelligence Systems. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 30(1), pp.208-221.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Sunilkumar Reddy Eraganeni. (2026). An Adaptive Governance-Centric MLOps Framework for Risk-Tiered Control and Continuous Assurance of Responsible AI in High-Stakes Domains. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5340

Issue

Section

Research Article