Hybrid Swarm Intelligence-Based Neural Framework for Optimizing Real-Time Computational Models in Engineering Systems

Authors

  • I. Bhuvaneshwarri Department of Information Technology, Government College of Engineering, Erode - 638316, Tamil Nadu, India
  • M. Maheswari Associate Professor, Department of Computational Intelligence, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, India.603203
  • C. Kalaivanan Department of EEE, Sona College of Technology, Salem-5,
  • P. Deepthi Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science & Engineering , Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh
  • Tatiraju V. Rajani Kanth Senior Manager,TVR Consulting Servisces Private Limited GAJULARAMARAM, Medchal Malkangiri district, HYDERABAD- 500055,Telegana,INDIA
  • V. Saravanan Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University,Chennai-602105,Tamilnadu,India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1001

Keywords:

Hybrid Swarm Intelligence, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), Real-Time Optimization, Engineering Systems, Computational Intelligence, IoT

Abstract

In modern engineering systems, real-time computational models are essential for optimizing performance, enhancing decision-making, and reducing latency in complex environments. This research presents a Hybrid Swarm Intelligence-Based Neural Framework (HSIN-F) to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and adaptability of real-time engineering computations. The proposed framework integrates Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) with a Deep Neural Network (DNN) to achieve a balance between exploration and exploitation, enabling optimal model parameter selection and reducing computational overhead. To validate the efficiency of HSIN-F, experiments were conducted across various real-time engineering applications, including industrial automation, smart grids, and IoT-based systems. The proposed model outperformed conventional optimization techniques in terms of processing speed, predictive accuracy, and system adaptability. Key performance metrics include: Prediction Accuracy: 98.2% (compared to 93.5% in traditional models), Computational Latency Reduction: 34.7%, Energy Efficiency Improvement: 27.5%, Error Rate Reduction: 32.1%. The hybrid swarm-based approach effectively adapts to dynamic changes in real-time scenarios, making it highly suitable for engineering applications requiring continuous optimization. Future research will explore hybrid metaheuristic strategies and federated learning-based decentralization to further enhance system performance and robustness.

References

Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1942–1948.

Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69;46–61.

Dorigo, M., & Gambardella, L. M. (1997). Ant colony system: A cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 53–66.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

Ghosh, A., Dehuri, S., & Ghosh, S. (2019). Multi-objective swarm intelligence: Theoretical advances and applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence (SCI, volume 592)

Li, X., Chen, H., & Wu, Q. (2020). Hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for feature selection in deep learning-based medical diagnosis. IEEE Access, 8;123134-123145.

Zhang, J., Tang, M., & Wang, G. (2021). Improving the efficiency of convolutional neural networks with hybrid optimization techniques. Neural Computing and Applications, 33;567–582.

Hassan, R., Cohanim, B., Weck, O., & Venter, G. (2005). A comparison of particle swarm optimization and the genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference.

Nguyen, G., Dlugolinsky, S., Bobák, M., et al. (2019). Machine learning and deep learning frameworks and libraries for large-scale data mining: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52, 77–124.

Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117.

Bansal, J. C., & Singh, P. K. (2020). Evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence (SCI, volume 779)

Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016). The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 95;51–67.

Zhou, J., Hu, X., & Zhang, H. (2022). Hybrid optimization for feature selection using swarm intelligence and deep learning models. Knowledge-Based Systems, 234, 107529.

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 770–778.

Oliva, D., Hinojosa, S., & Cuevas, E. (2017). A hybrid method combining particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony for feature selection. Soft Computing, 21(19), 5553–5563.

Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 97, 6105–6114.

Guo, Y., Shen, Z., & Li, J. (2020). A hybrid grey wolf optimizer-based deep neural network model for real-time IoT anomaly detection. Journal of Computational Science, 42, 101074.

Liang, X., Zhou, Y., & Chen, X. (2021). Adaptive feature selection using ant colony optimization for deep neural networks in industrial automation applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 182, 115174.

Jiao, Y., & Li, X. (2023). Hybrid metaheuristic strategies for real-time deep learning optimization in smart city applications. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 7(2), 256–270

N. Vidhya, & C. Meenakshi. (2025). Blockchain-Enabled Secure Data Aggregation Routing (BSDAR) Protocol for IoT-Integrated Next-Generation Sensor Networks for Enhanced Security. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.722

Amjan Shaik, Bhuvan Unhelkar, & Prasun Chakrabarti. (2025). Exploring Artificial Intelligence and Data Science-Based Security and its Scope in IoT Use Cases. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.869

Alkhatib, A., Albdor , L., Fayyad, S., & Ali, H. (2024). Blockchain-Enhanced Multi-Factor Authentication for Securing IoT Children’s Toys: Securing IoT Children’s Toys. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.417

P. Jagdish Kumar, & S. Neduncheliyan. (2024). A novel optimized deep learning based intrusion detection framework for an IoT networks. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.597

Vutukuru, S. R., & Srinivasa Chakravarthi Lade. (2025). CoralMatrix: A Scalable and Robust Secure Framework for Enhancing IoT Cybersecurity. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.825

Iqbal, A., Shaima Qureshi, & Mohammad Ahsan Chishti. (2025). Bringing Context into IoT: Vision and Research Challenges. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.760

Downloads

Published

2025-02-16

How to Cite

I. Bhuvaneshwarri, M. Maheswari, C. Kalaivanan, P. Deepthi, Tatiraju V. Rajani Kanth, & V. Saravanan. (2025). Hybrid Swarm Intelligence-Based Neural Framework for Optimizing Real-Time Computational Models in Engineering Systems. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1001

Issue

Section

Research Article