Estimation Of Turkey's Carbon Dioxide Emission with Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.302Keywords:
ANN, CO2 emission, AIAbstract
Carbon dioxide emissions are an important factor in the increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and climate change. Controlling and reducing carbon dioxide emissions plays an important role in combating global warming and climate change. Various national and international efforts are being carried out to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and switch to sustainable energy sources. For this reason, estimating carbon dioxide emissions in the coming years is important for determining the measures to be taken.
In this study, Turkey's carbon dioxide emissions are successfully estimated using two different machine learning models. The success of the study was evaluated using three different statistical measures: R2, MSE and MAE. The R2 of decision trees was 89.4%, MSE was 0.013 and MAE was 0.011; the R2 of artificial neural networks was 92.7%, MSE was 0.009 and MAE was 0.006. When we compare the two models, it is seen that ANN is more successful than decision trees and predicts with less error.
References
Kunt, F. (2007). Hava Kirliliğinin Yapay Sinir Ağları Yöntemiyle Modellenmesi ve Tahmini, Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, M.Sc. Thesis, Environmental Engineering Department, Konya.
Aydınlar, B., Güveni H. ve Kırksekiz, S. (2009). Hava Kirliliği ve Modellenmesi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü Yüksek Lisans Rapor.
Alimissis, A., Philippopoulos, K., Tzanis, C.G., and Deligiorgi, D. (2018). Spatial estimation of urban air pollution with the use of artificial neural network models, Atmospheric Environment, 191, 205-213, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.058
Hu, K. & Rahman, A. (2017). HazeEst: Machine Learning Based Metropolitan Air Pollution Estimation From Fixed and Mobile Sensors, IEEE Sensors, 17(11): 3571-3525. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2690975 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2690975
Huang, C-J., & Kuo, P-H. (2018). A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities, Sensors DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072220
Martínez-Espaňa, R., Bueno-Crespo, A., Timón, I., Soto, J., Muňoz, A. & Cecilia, J.M. (2018). Air-Pollution Prediction in Smart Cities through Machine Learning Methods: A Case of Study in Murcia, Spain.
Tamas, W., Notton, G., Paoli, C., Nivet, M-L. & Voyant, C. (2016). Hybridization of Air Quality Frecasting Models Using Machine Learning and Clustering: An Orginal Approach to Detect Pollutant Peaks, Aerosol and Air Qaulity Research, 16: 405-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.03.0193
Zaree, T. & Honarvar, A.R. (2018). Improvement of Air Pollution Prediction in a Smart City and its Correction with Weather Conditions using Metrological Big Data, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 26: 1302-1313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1707-99
Kuhn, M., Johnson, K., Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Data pre-processing. Applied predictive modeling, 27-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3_3
Onoz, B., & Oguz, B. (2003). Assessment of outliers in statistical data analysis. Integrated technologies for environmental monitoring and information production, 173-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0231-8_13
Kwak, S. K., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and outliers. Korean journal of anaesthesiology, 70(4), 407-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.407
Nayak, S. C., Misra, B. B., & Behera, H. S. (2014). Impact of data normalization on stock index forecasting. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 6(2014), 257-269.
Yu, L., Wang, S., & Lai, K. K. (2005). An integrated data preparation scheme for neural network data analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(2), 217-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2006.22
Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2022). Normalization methods for spatio‐temporal analysis of environmental performance: Revisiting the Min–Max method. Environmetrics, 33(5), e2730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2730
Kabas, O., Kayakus, M., Ünal, İ., & Moiceanu, G. (2023). Deformation Energy Estimation of Cherry Tomato Based on Some Engineering Parameters Using Machine-Learning Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158906
Kayakuş, M., Terzioğlu, M., Erdoğan, D., Zetter, S. A., Kabas, O., & Moiceanu, G. (2023). European Union 2030 carbon emission target: The case of Turkey. Sustainability, 15(17), 13025. DOI: 10.3390/su151713025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713025
Geurts, P., Irrthum, A., & Wehenkel, L. (2009). Supervised learning with decision tree-based methods in computational and systems biology. Molecular Biosystems, 5(12), 1593-1605. DOI: 10.1039/b907946g DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B907946G
Thomas, T., P. Vijayaraghavan, A., Emmanuel, S. (2020). Applications of decision trees. Machine learning approaches in cyber security analytics, 157-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1706-8_9
Kayakuş, M., & Açikgöz, F. Y. (2022). Classification of News Texts by Categories Using Machine Learning Methods. Alphanumeric Journal, 10(2), 155-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1149753
Kriegeskorte, N. (2015). Deep neural networks: a new framework for modeling biological vision and brain information processing. Annual review of vision science, 1, 417-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035447
Ünal U., G. F., Terzioğlu, M., Kayakuş, M., Tutcu, B., Çoşgun, A., Tonguç, G., & Kaplan Yildirim, R. (2023). Estimation of Methane Gas Production in Turkey Using Machine Learning Methods. Applied Sciences, 13(14), 8442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148442
Kayakus, M., Tutcu, B., Terzioglu, M., Talaş, H., & Ünal Uyar, G. F. (2023). ROA and ROE Forecasting in Iron and Steel Industry Using Machine Learning Techniques for Sustainable Profitability. Sustainability, 15(9), 7389. DOI:10.3390/su15097389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097389
Huang, Y., Kangas, L. J., & Rasco, B. A. (2007). Applications of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in food science. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 47(2), 113-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390600626453
Yağmur, A., Kayakuş, M., & Terzioğlu, M. (2022). House price prediction modeling using machine learning techniques: a comparative study. Aestimum, 81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-13703
Piepho, H. P. (2019). A coefficient of determination (R2) for generalized linear mixed models. Biometrical Journal, 61(4), 860-872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201800270
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2009). Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE signal processing magazine, 26(1), 98-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2008.930649
Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE). Geoscientific model development discussions, 7(1), 1525-1534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-1525-2014
Xu, X., He, X., Ai, Q., & Qiu, R. C. (2015). A correlation analysis method for power systems based on random matrix theory. IEEE Transactions on smart grid, 8(4), 1811-1820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2508506
Hu, Q., Che, X., Zhang, L., Zhang, D., Guo, M., & Yu, D. (2011). Rank entropy-based decision trees for monotonic classification. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 24(11), 2052-2064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2011.149
Kingsford, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2008). What are decision trees?. Nature biotechnology, 26(9), 1011-1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0908-1011
Ağbulut, Ü. (2022). Forecasting of transportation-related energy demand and CO2 emissions in Turkey with different machine learning algorithms. Sustainable Production and Cons. 29, 141-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.001
Kayakuş, M., & Açikgöz, F Y. (2023). Fake News Detection on Twitter with Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Abant Social Sciences, 23(2), 1017-1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1266179
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
