Analysis of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Authors

  • Jyotika Gajendra
  • Keerthi Kumar N
  • Kiran K
  • Chethan M R
  • Ravikumar R
  • Thejaraju R

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3317

Keywords:

Laser Powder Bed , Fusion (LPBF), Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Abstract

The metal additive manufacturing technique, Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), produces complex, precise components through widespread adoption. The process is substantially affected by gas flow dynamics that control both spatter removal, thermal distribution, and part quality. The research uses Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to analyse how bypass systems, nozzle configurations, and suction pressures affect LPBF chamber gas flow optimisation. The ANSYS Fluent software performed a comprehensive numerical evaluation to analyse velocity fields and pressure distributions and streamline patterns across different operational conditions. Implementing bypass systems leads to stabilised flow patterns by reducing recirculation zones and creating uniformity, enhancing melt pool consistency. Implementing optimised nozzles enhances flow efficiency by reducing turbulence while improving spatter ejection. The variation of suction pressure had a moderate effect on velocity distribution, but it proved essential for controlling chamber pressure and gas flow rate. The Coanda effect was observed to influence gas adherence to chamber surfaces, affecting thermal management. The research delivers necessary technical knowledge about LPBF gas flow system optimisation, leading to better manufacturing precision, reduced defects, and increased process dependability.

References

[1] L. Ladani and M. Sadeghilaridjani, “Review of Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing for Metals,” Metals 2021, Vol. 11, Page 1391, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 1391, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/MET11091391.

[2] S. R. Narasimharaju et al., “A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends,” J Manuf Process, vol. 75, pp. 375–414, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2021.12.033.

[3] M. Armstrong, H. Mehrabi, and N. Naveed, “An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology,” J Manuf Process, vol. 84, pp. 1001–1029, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2022.10.060.

[4] E. Santecchia, S. Spigarelli, and M. Cabibbo, “Material Reuse in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Side Effects of the Laser—Metal Powder Interaction,” Metals 2020, Vol. 10, Page 341, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 341, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.3390/MET10030341.

[5] J. D. Roehling et al., “Physics of large-area pulsed laser powder bed fusion,” Addit Manuf, vol. 46, p. 102186, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.102186.

[6] N. Alinejadian, L. Kollo, and I. Odnevall, “Progress in additive manufacturing of MoS2-based structures for energy storage applications – A review,” Mater Sci Semicond Process, vol. 139, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106331.

[7] P. V. Cobbinah, R. A. Nzeukou, O. T. Onawale, and W. R. Matizamhuka, “Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Potential Superalloys: A Review,” Metals 2021, Vol. 11, Page 58, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 58, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/MET11010058.

[8] S. Sanchez, A. Zafari, L. Caprio, A. G. Demir, and D. Jafari, “Temporal and Spatial Beam Shaping in LPBF for Fine and Porous Ti-Alloy Structures for Regenerative Fuel Cell Applications,” Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 154–178, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S40516-023-00244-3/FIGURES/13.

[9] J. Wang, R. Zhu, Y. Liu, and L. Zhang, “Understanding melt pool characteristics in laser powder bed fusion: An overview of single- and multi-track melt pools for process optimization,” Advanced Powder Materials, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 100137, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.APMATE.2023.100137.

[10] S. Chowdhury et al., “Laser powder bed fusion: a state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modelling,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 20, pp. 2109–2172, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.07.121.

[11] E. De Leon, A. Riensche, B. D. Bevans, C. Billings, Z. Siddique, and Y. Liu, “A Review of Modeling, Simulation, and Process Qualification of Additively Manufactured Metal Components via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Method,” Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2025, Vol. 9, Page 22, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 22, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/JMMP9010022.

[12] M. A. Mahmood, A. U. Rehman, F. Pitir, M. U. Salamci, and I. N. Mihailescu, “Laser Melting Deposition Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic In-Situ Flow Field Mapping via Computational Fluid Dynamics and Analytical Modelling with Empirical Testing,” Materials 2021, Vol. 14, Page 7749, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 7749, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/MA14247749.

[13] T. Yu and J. Zhao, “Quantitative simulation of selective laser melting of metals enabled by new high-fidelity multiphase, multiphysics computational tool,” Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, vol. 399, p. 115422, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.CMA.2022.115422.

[14] Y. Hu et al., “Multi-physics modeling for laser powder bed fusion process of NiTi shape memory alloy,” J Alloys Compd, vol. 954, p. 170207, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2023.170207.

[15] U. Chadha et al., “Powder Bed Fusion via Machine Learning-Enabled Approaches,” Complexity, vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 9481790, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/9481790.

[16] R. Rahmani, B. Bashiri, S. I. Lopes, A. Hussain, H. S. Maurya, and R. Vilu, “Sustainable Additive Manufacturing: An Overview on Life Cycle Impacts and Cost Efficiency of Laser Powder Bed Fusion,” Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 2025, Vol. 9, Page 18, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 18, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/JMMP9010018.

[17] N. Khan and A. Riccio, “A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: Current trends and future directions,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 149, p. 101021, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.PAEROSCI.2024.101021.

[18] U. Chadha et al., “Powder Bed Fusion via Machine Learning-Enabled Approaches,” Complexity, vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 9481790, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/9481790.

[19] N. D. Dejene and H. G. Lemu, “Current Status and Challenges of Powder Bed Fusion-Based Metal Additive Manufacturing: Literature Review,” Metals 2023, Vol. 13, Page 424, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 424, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/MET13020424.

[20] A. Ullah, M. Shah, Z. Ali, K. Asami, A. Ur Rehman, and C. Emmelmann, “Additive manufacturing of ceramics via the laser powder bed fusion process,” Int J Appl Ceram Technol, p. e15087, 2025, doi: 10.1111/IJAC.15087.

[21] S. R. Narasimharaju et al., “A comprehensive review on laser powder bed fusion of steels: Processing, microstructure, defects and control methods, mechanical properties, current challenges and future trends,” J Manuf Process, vol. 75, pp. 375–414, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2021.12.033.

[22] N. O’Brien, S. Z. Uddin, J. Weaver, J. Jones, S. Singh, and J. Beuth, “Computational analysis and experiments of spatter transport in a laser powder bed fusion machine,” Addit Manuf, vol. 84, p. 104133, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2024.104133.

[23] W. Abd-Elaziem, S. Elkatatny, T. A. Sebaey, M. A. Darwish, M. A. Abd El-Baky, and A. hamada, “Machine learning for advancing laser powder bed fusion of stainless steel,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 30, pp. 4986–5016, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.JMRT.2024.04.130.

[24] T. Dahmen, “General rights Additive Manufacturing for Fuel Injectors: Design, Processes and Materials.”

[25] H. Deng, Z. Wang, J. Wang, and H. Li, “Flow and heat transfer in a rotating channel with impingement cooling and film extraction,” Int J Heat Mass Transf, vol. 180, p. 121751, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2021.121751.

[26] J. Hoffmann and M. P. Venter, Proceeding of the 13th South African Conference on Computational and Applied Mechanics. [Online]. Available: https://saam.africa/

[27] B. Anwajler, “Potential of 3D Printing for Heat Exchanger Heat Transfer Optimization—Sustainability Perspective,” Inventions 2024, Vol. 9, Page 60, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 60, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/INVENTIONS9030060.

[28] C. Y. Chien, T. N. Le, Z. H. Lin, and Y. L. Lo, “Numerical and experimental investigation into gas flow field and spattering phenomena in laser powder bed fusion processing of Inconel 718,” Mater Des, vol. 210, p. 110107, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2021.110107.

[29] “What is Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)? | Ansys.” Accessed: Apr. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.ansys.com/en-in/simulation-topics/what-is-computational-fluid-dynamics.

[30] T. M. Oyinloye and W. B. Yoon, “Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulation for the Effective Design of Food 3D Printing (A Review),” Processes 2021, Vol. 9, Page 1867, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 1867, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/PR9111867.

[31] B.S. Surendra, K.S. Anantharaju, M. Rudresh, Mg-doped ZrO2 ceramic nanoparticles for thermal barrier coating and optical applications, Advanced Ceramic Coatings for Energy Applications, ELSEVIER SERIES IN ADVANCED CERAMIC MATERIALS, Feb-2024, ISBN: 978-0-323-99620-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99620-4.00020-8.

[32] Rudresh M, Nitesh Karbari, Maruthi BH, Investigation of Stresses in Turbine Engine Disc, International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 3 (2017), 1-7. ISSN: 2454-8006, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7324/IJASRE.2017.32478.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-10

How to Cite

Jyotika Gajendra, Kumar N, K., Kiran K, Chethan M R, Ravikumar R, & Thejaraju R. (2025). Analysis of Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3317

Issue

Section

Research Article