Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Optimal Neighbour Cells for LTE Handover in Dense Urban Areas: A Case Study from San Francisco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3438Keywords:
Efficient LTE handover, Drive test, Machıne learning, LTE sub-parametersAbstract
The demand for uninterrupted and high-speed mobile data continues to grow, driven by the rapid expansion of IoT systems, communication applications, social media platforms, and the increasing number of mobile users. The handover mechanism plays a critical role in maintaining uninterrupted service during user mobility, and indirectly affects data throughput by influencing the device's Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP) levels. In LTE systems—which remain widely used globally—the handover process is vital for ensuring service quality, and its significance is expected to increase further with the densification of base stations in upcoming 5G and 6G technologies. In this study, we utilize a dense LTE drive test dataset to first estimate the device’s distance to the base station and the geographical locations of base stations. These estimates, combined with parameters such as serving and neighbour cell identities and DL EARFCNs from seven different cells, are then used to develop an efficient machine learning–based handover prediction model. To evaluate and compare the performance of the Random Forest and XGBoost algorithms, multi-class classification metrics including precision, recall, and F1-score were utilized. The results demonstrate that Random Forest model can effectively identify the optimal target cell without the need for traditional, complex handover algorithms. The XGBoost algorithm gave much lower handover performance rates and F1-score compared to Random Forest.
References
[1] Alam, M. J., Hossain, M. R., Azad, S., & Chugh, R. (2023). An overview of LTE/LTE‐A heterogeneous networks for 5G and beyond. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 34(8), e4806.
[2] Chen, W., Lin, X., Lee, J., Toskala, A., Sun, S., Chiasserini, C. F., & Liu, L. (2023). 5G-advanced toward 6G: Past, present, and future. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 41(6), 1592-1619.
[3] Rehman, A. U., Roslee, M. B., & Jun Jiat, T. (2023). A survey of handover management in mobile HetNets: Current challenges and future directions. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3367.
[4] Mahamod, U., Mohamad, H., Shayea, I., Othman, M., & Asuhaimi, F. A. (2023). Handover parameter for self-optimisation in 6G mobile networks: A survey. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 78, 104-119.
[5] Mohsin, H. S., Saad, W. K., & Shayea, I. (2023, October). Literature review of handover decision algorithms in 5G networks. In 2023 10th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[6] Fetaji, M., & Havolli, A. (2024, March). AI-ML-Based Handover Techniques in Next-Generation Wireless Networks. In International Symposium on Signal and Image Processing (pp. 91-106). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[7] Ullah, Y., Roslee, M. B., Mitani, S. M., Khan, S. A., & Jusoh, M. H. (2023). A survey on handover and mobility management in 5G HetNets: current state, challenges, and future directions. Sensors, 23(11), 5081.
[8] Shayea, I., Dushi, P., Banafaa, M., Rashid, R. A., Ali, S., Sarijari, M. A., ... & Mohamad, H. (2022). Handover management for drones in future mobile networks—A survey. Sensors, 22(17), 6424.
[9] Chabira, C., Shayea, I., Nurzhaubayeva, G., Aldasheva, L., Yedilkhan, D., & Amanzholova, S. (2025). AI-Driven Handover Management and Load Balancing Optimization in Ultra-Dense 5G/6G Cellular Networks. Technologies, 13(7), 276.
[10] Ayass, T., Coqueiro, T., Carvalho, T., Jailton, J., Araújo, J., & Francês, R. (2022). Unmanned aerial vehicle with handover management fuzzy system for 5G networks: challenges and perspectives. Intell Robot, 2(1), 20-36.
[11] Seeram, S. S. S. G., Feltrin, L., Ozger, M., Zhang, S., & Cavdar, C. (2025). Handover challenges in disaggregated open RAN for LEO Satellites: tradeoff between handover delay and onboard processing. Frontiers in Space Technologies, 6, 1580005.
[12] Beyaz, M. (2024). Satellite communications with 5G, B5G, and 6G: challenges and prospects. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 17(3), 31-49.
[13] Khan, S. A., Shayea, I., Ergen, M., & Mohamad, H. (2022). Handover management over dual connectivity in 5G technology with future ultra-dense mobile heterogeneous networks: A review. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 35, 101172.
[14] Maiwada, U. D., Abdalla, G. S. S., Singh, N. S. S., & Salameh, A. A. (2025). Efficient energy utilization in LTE networks with intelligent handover mechanisms. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 18(3), 101599.
[15] Jon, J. H., Jong, C., Ryu, K. S., & Kim, W. (2024). Enhanced uplink handover scheme for improvement of energy efficiency and QoS in LTE-A/5G HetNet with ultra-dense small cells. Wireless Networks, 30(3), 1321-1338.
[16] Maiwada, U. D., Danyaro, K. U., Sarlan, A. B., & Aliyu, A. A. (2024). Dynamic Handover Optimization Protocol to enhance energy efficiency within the A-LTE 5G network's two-tier architecture. International Journal of Data Informatics and Intelligent Computing, 3(3), 8-15.
[17] Okoli, C. A., Idigo, V. E., Oguejiofor, O. S., & Ezeugbor, I. C. (2023). Performance Improvement of Handover Scheme For An Established Long Term Evolution (LTE) Network. Electroscope Journal, 11, 48-56.
[18] Eyceyurt, E., Egi, Y., & Zec, J. (2022). Machine-learning-based uplink throughput prediction from physical layer measurements. Electronics, 11(8), 1227.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.