Integration of Technology in Learning: Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Secondary School Students

Authors

  • Ahmad Tohir
  • Suyitno Muslim
  • Robinson Situmorang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3474

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, hots, Secondary education, Technology integration, Critical thinking, Problem-solving

Abstract

Abstract

The integration of technology, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), in secondary education has shown significant potential in enhancing students' higher-order thinking Skills (HOTS). This study regularly reviews 18 articles to examine how digital platforms and AI tools are being used to support critical, analytical, and creative thinking among students. Findings indicate that AI-enhanced learning environments stimulate deeper engagement with learning content, foster independent problem-solving, and encourage reflective thinking. Beyond facilitating access to information, technology is also reshaping students' mindsets, shifting them from passive consumers to active thinkers. Despite its growing adoption, research on AI's direct impact on HOTS remains limited. This study contributes to the existing literature by exploring not only the benefits but also the pedagogical implications of AI integration in secondary education. Through this, the study aims to inform educators and policymakers about strategies to optimize technology use for cognitive development in learners.

 

Implications for practice or policy:

  • Educators can enhance critical and creative thinking by integrating AI tools into project-based learning activities.
  • Curriculum designers should consider embedding AI-supported platforms to promote reflective and analytical skills.
  • Policymakers may invest in teacher training to build capacity in using AI for cognitive skill development.
  • School leaders can support infrastructure that allows personalized AI-driven learning environments.
  • Instructional designers may develop resources that use AI feedback features to foster problem-solving skills.

 

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, hots, secondary education, technology integration, critical thinking, problem-solving, creative thinking

References

[1] Yanuarto, W. N., Hapsari, I., & Setyaningsih, E. (2023). Modeling the effect of higher-order thinking skills and technological pedagogical content knowledge on students’ digital literacy. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.7(6)06

[2] Dahalan, S. C., Ahmad, A. R., & Awang, M. M. (2020). The effectiveness of the 21st century teaching history module (21-Cthm) towards high order thinking skills. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(11), 106–120.

[3] Abdul Khalil, S., Mohd Razif, N. F., & Rosele, M. I. (2024). Developing ijtihad skills for undergraduate students through problem-based learning in fiqh subjects: Present practices and the way forward. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 39(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2024.39.2.11

[4] Lee, H.-Y., Wu, T.-T., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2024). Integrating computational thinking into scaffolding learning: An innovative approach to enhance science, technology, engineering, and mathematics hands-on learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 431–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231211916

[5] Li, P.-H., Lee, H.-Y., Lin, C.-J., Wang, W.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2025). InquiryGPT: Augmenting ChatGPT for enhancing inquiry-based learning in STEM education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 2157–2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241289824

[6] Chang, C.-Y., Lin, H.-C., Yin, C., & Yang, K.-H. (2025). Generative AI-assisted reflective writing for improving students’ higher order thinking: Evidence from quantitative and epistemic network analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 28(1), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202501_28(1).TP03

[7] Avargil, S. (2022). Knowledge and skills of university students in chemistry-related departments as expressed in a specially designed escape-room. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09986-9

[8] Gaber, T., El-Ghamry, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2022). Injection attack detection using machine learning for smart IoT applications. Physical Communication, 52, 101685.

[9] Sassis, L., Kefala-Karli, P., Sassi, M., & Zervides, C. (2021). Exploring medical students’ and faculty’s perception on artificial intelligence and robotics: A questionnaire survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Medical Sciences, 2(1), 76–84.

[10] Salloum, S., Gaber, T., Vadera, S., & Shaalan, K. (2022). A systematic literature review on phishing email detection using natural language processing techniques. IEEE Access, 10, 65703–65727.

[11] Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1–23.

[12] Kliestik, T., Nica, E., Durana, P., & Popescu, G. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based predictive maintenance, time-sensitive networking, and big data-driven algorithmic decision-making in the economics of Industrial Internet of Things. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(4), 1097–1138.

[13] Desnelita, Y., Susanti, W., Rizal, F., & Ritonga, A. R. (2023). The implementation of collaborative project based learning model with inquiry process using e-learning in higher education. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17762/kuey.v29i1.526

[14] Haddaway, N. R. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230

[15] Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

[16] Ed-Dafali, S., Adardour, Z., Derj, A., Bami, A., & Hussainey, K. (2025). A PRISMA-based systematic review on economic, social, and governance practices: Insights and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(2), 1896–1916. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4069

[17] Lombao, T. F. (2018). Indicators for the communication of the corporate social responsibility of European public broadcasting. Prisma Social, 22, 160–183.

[18] Vanderhout, S., Bird, M., Giannarakos, A., Panesar, B., & Whitmore, C. (2024). Evaluation methods, indicators, and outcomes in learning health systems: Protocol for a jurisdictional scan. JMIR Research Protocols, 13. https://doi.org/10.2196/57929

[19] Charania, A., Bakshani, U., Paltiwale, S., Kaur, I., & Nasrin, N. (2021). Constructivist teaching and learning with technologies in the COVID-19 lockdown in Eastern India. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1478–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13111

[20] Uddin, M. M., Chew, R. S. Y., McNeill, L. J., Islam, M. N., Awoyemi, I. D., & Sharmin, T. (2024). Infusing cognitivist and constructivist practices in teaching American plays to develop students’ critical thinking skills. International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 32(1), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v32i01/165-192

[21] Hawk, H. (2024). Unlocking the potential: Enhancing higher-order thinking skills in accounting education. Accounting Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2375600

[22] Sumarwati, S., Fitriyani, H., Setiaji, F. M. A., Amiruddin, M. H., & Jalil, S. A. (2020). Developing mathematics learning media based on e-learning using Moodle on geometry subject to improve students’ higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12731

[23] Nadarajan, K., et al. (2023). The effectiveness of a technology-based isometrical transformation flipped classroom learning strategy in improving students’ higher order thinking skills. IEEE Access, 11, 4155–4172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3230860

[24] Nussbaum, M., et al. (2021). Taking critical thinking, creativity and grit online. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09867-1

[25] Venkatraman, S., & Nayak, R. R. (2015). Relationships among triple bottom line elements: Focus on integrating sustainable business practices. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2012-0013

[26] Nikolic, S., et al. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.9643

[27] S. Venkatraman, F. Benli, Y. Wei, and F. Wahr, (2022) .Smart Classroom Teaching Strategy to Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). An Agile Approach for Education 4.0, Future Internet, vol. 14, no. 9

[28] X. Ren and M. L. Wu, (2025). Examining Teaching Competencies and Challenges While Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education, TechTrends,

[29] H.-Y. Lee, P.-H. Chen, W.-S. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu, (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1

[30] F. Uzun, F. Akcan, Z. Pancar, and H. M. Sahin, (2021) A Debate on Exercise Addiction Levels of Sport Sciences Students. Marwah Infotech.

[31] M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 460–474

[32] L. I. Ruiz-Rojas, P. Acosta-Vargas, J. De-Moreta-Llovet, and M. Gonzalez-Rodriguez (2023). Empowering education with generative artificial intelligence tools: Approach with an instructional design matrix. Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 15

[33] C. McGrath, A. Farazouli, and T. Cerratto-Pargman (2024). Generative AI chatbots in higher education: A review of an emerging research area. High. Educ., pp. 1–17

[34] J. Martín-Lucas and Á. García del Dujo,(2023). Knowledge-building in an environment mediated by digital technology: A case study in higher education. Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3267–3287

[35] M. Firat, (2023). “How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education?

Downloads

Published

2025-07-17

How to Cite

Ahmad Tohir, Suyitno Muslim, & Robinson Situmorang. (2025). Integration of Technology in Learning: Enhancing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Secondary School Students. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3474

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): IJCESEN

Section

Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.