Computational and Experimental Evaluation of Secure Firmware Development Using Rust and AI‑Driven DevOps Automation

Authors

  • Lalith Lakshmi Chaitanya Kumar Mangalagiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4621

Keywords:

Rust Programming Language, Firmware Development, AI-Driven DevOps, Memory Safety, Cross-Compilation

Abstract

This study presents a computational and experimental evaluation of secure firmware development using the Rust programming language integrated with AI‑driven DevOps automation. Modern firmware engineering continues to face challenges related to memory‑safety defects, multi‑architecture build complexity, and manual continuous‑integration configuration. To address these issues, the proposed framework combines Rust’s ownership‑based compile‑time safety guarantees with multi‑target cross‑compilation pipelines for x86‑64 and ARM, QEMU‑based hardware‑in‑the‑loop simulation, and machine‑learning‑assisted automation incorporating gradient‑boosted decision trees, natural language processing techniques, and multi‑agent orchestration for pipeline synthesis, compliance prediction, and diagnostic analysis. Experimental validation was performed using Azure DevOps infrastructure and included systematic benchmarking with paired t‑tests (n = 30 per configuration), bootstrap confidence intervals (10,000 iterations), and coefficient of variation analysis to ensure statistical robustness. The evaluation integrates cargo‑based testing, QEMU emulation, and automated performance‑regression detection.Results demonstrate complete elimination of memory‑safety vulnerabilities in Rust components, a 90–95% reduction in developer onboarding time, a 75–85% decrease in build failure‑resolution effort, and performance parity with optimized C++ implementations (p < 0.05). Reliability also improved, with defect‑escape rates approaching zero during production deployment. Overall, the findings validate Rust’s suitability for security‑critical firmware and highlight the engineering benefits of incorporating AI‑assisted DevOps workflows. The study provides reproducible computational methods, experimental protocols, and implementation patterns for organizations seeking scalable, memory‑safe, and automated firmware development practices.

References

[1] V. Makwana, "DevOps Scaling Practices — A Roadmap With Challenges and Strategies," DevOps.com, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://devops.com/devops-scaling-practices-a-roadmap-with-challenges-and-strategies/

[2] G. Klees, et al., "Evaluating Fuzz Testing," ACM, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://users.umiacs.umd.edu/~tudor/courses/ENEE657/Fall19/papers/Klees18.pdf

[3] R. JUNG, et al., "RustBelt: Securing the Foundations of the Rust Programming Language," Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://people.mpi-sws.org/~dreyer/papers/rustbelt/paper.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3158154

[4] A S Mohammed, et al., "AI-Driven Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment in Software Engineering," ResearchGate, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379772841_AI-Driven_Continuous_Integration_and_Continuous_Deployment_in_Software_Engineering DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDT61202.2024.10489475

[5] H XU, et al., "Memory-Safety Challenge Considered Solved? An In-Depth Study with All Rust CVEs," arXiv, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.03296

[6] S. Klabnik and C. Nichols, “The Rust Programming Language,” San Francisco, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://dl.ebooksworld.ir/motoman/No.Starch.Press.The.Rust.Programming.Language.www.EBooksWorld.ir.pdf

[7] A. Balasubramanian, et al., "System Programming in Rust: Beyond Safety," ACM Digital Library, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3139645.3139660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3139645.3139660

[8] Z. Rasheed, et al., "Large Language Models for Code Generation: The Practitioners' Perspective," arXiv, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16998

[9] Y. ZHANG, et al., "Detecting similar repositories on GitHub," SANER 2017: Proceedings of 24th IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering: Klagenfurt, Austria, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/sis_research/article/4616/&path_info=Detecting_Similar_Repositories_on_GitHub_2017_SANER.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2017.7884605

[10] V. Tarsariya, "Predictive DevOps: Using AI to Forecast Failures Before They Occur," Vasundhara, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://vasundhara.io/blogs/predictive-devops-using-ai-to-forecast-failures-before-they-occur

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Lalith Lakshmi Chaitanya Kumar Mangalagiri. (2025). Computational and Experimental Evaluation of Secure Firmware Development Using Rust and AI‑Driven DevOps Automation. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4621

Issue

Section

Research Article