Subtler manifestations of patriarchal gender norms on gender relations- A qualitative investigation on Engineering college students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.473Keywords:
Gender;, Gender Relations, Engineering studentsAbstract
Gender disparity is observed to be markedly higher in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields, as evident from the findings of earlier research studies. Gender relations refer to the complex dynamics of social interactions between men and women in a social group setting; they are one of the determining factors of gender disparity. Hence, this investigative study focuses on the informal interactions among men and women students of private engineering colleges to gain insights into how patriarchal norms contribute to gender disparity. Private technological institutions are specifically chosen as the study as it is noted that they have been given less focus in this particular area of study. Although the gender dynamics of the contemporary Indian society has witnessed considerable change with liberalization and globalization, patriarchy continues to remain deeply entrenched and poses a formidable challenge in the cultural and social phenomenon of gender construction in various social realms. This persisting patriarchal trend tends to be reflected in the students’ perception of gender norms. The present study aims to highlight the challenges of gender relations among students and attempts to offer feasible inputs to foster gender equality within the academic community in college campuses by actively promoting inclusivity and parity. This research study is cross-sectional, employs qualitative methods to obtain gender relations through the face-to-face interview method used to collect data from the students to gain full understanding of the gender environment of the campus, the prevalence of patriarchy in the educational system and the influence of patriarchal norms on the student community
References
. Gupta N. (2020). Patriarchy reinforced or challenged? A study of engineering students in an elite Indian institute. Gend Technol Dev. 3;24(2):250–270.
. Bose M, Mukhopadhyay CC, Seymour S. (1996). Women, Education, & Family Structure in India. Pac Aff. Spring 69(1):124.
. Derne, S., & Jadwin, L. (2000). Male Hindi filmgoers' gaze: An ethnographic interpretation. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 34(2), 243-269.
. Ram U, Strohschein L, Gaur K. (2014). Gender Socialization: Differences between Male and Female Youth in India and Associations with Mental Health. Int J Popul Res. 1–11.
. Gupta, M. D., Chung, W., & Shuzhuo, L. (2009). Evidence for an incipient decline in numbers of missing girls in China and India. Population and Development Review, 35(2), 401-416.
. Alvesson, M., & Due Billing, Y. (2009). Understanding gender and organizations.
. Singh KK. (2017). Queering colonial power: Sikh resistance in the Ghadr movement. Sikh Formations: Religion, Culture, Theory. 13(4):268–90.
. Burns J. (2017). Biopolitics, Toxic Masculinities, Disavowed Histories, and Youth Radicalization. Peace Review. 29(2):176–83.
. Aneja A. (2019). Women’s and gender studies in India: Crossings. Women’s and Gender Studies in India: Crossings. 18;1–386.
. Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-cultural research, 38(1), 52-88.
. Bansal, P. (2012). Youth in contemporary India: Images of identity and social change. Springer science & business media.
. Gupta N. Rethinking the relationship between gender and technology: a study of the Indian example. Work, Employment and Society. 2015 Aug 21;29(4):661–72.
. Zollman A. (2012). Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. Sch Sci Math. 112(1):12–9.
. Li, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: A systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
. AISHE Survey [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 11]. Available from: https://aishe.gov.in/aishe/viewDocument.action?documentId=277
. Gupta N. (2020). Patriarchy reinforced or challenged? A study of engineering students in an elite Indian institute. Gend Technol Dev. 24(2):250–270.
. Sonnert, G., Fox, M. F., & Adkins, K. (2007). Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fields, and institutions over time. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1333-1356.
. Bearman, S., Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. (2009). The fabric of internalized sexism. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 1(1), 10-47.
. Gautam, M. (2015). Gender, subject choice and higher education in India: Exploring ‘choices’ and ‘constraints’ of women students. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 12(1), 31-58.
. Patel, R., & Parmentier, M. J. C. (2005). The persistence of traditional gender roles in the information technology sector: A study of female engineers in India. Information Technologies & International Development, 2(3), pp-29.
. Chatterjee C, Ramu S. (2018). Gender and its rising role in modern Indian innovation and entrepreneurship. IIMB Management Review. 30(1):62–72.
. J. Robinson, G., & McIlwee, J. S. (1989). Women in engineering: A promise unfulfilled?. Social Problems, 36(5), 455-472.
. Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & society, 5(2), 178-192.
. Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?.1818 R Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20009.
. Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020119
. Nadal KL, Vigilia Escobar KM, Prado GT, David EJR, Haynes K. (2012). Racial microaggressions and the Filipino American experience: Recommendations for counseling and development. J Multicult Couns Devel. 40(3):156–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2012.00015.x
. Faulkner W. (2013). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies. 1(3):169–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620903225059
. Faulkner W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. I. Observations from the field. Engineering Studies. 1(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620902721322
. Gupta N. (2019). Intersectionality of gender and caste in academic performance: quantitative study of an elite Indian engineering institute. Gend Technol Dev. 23(2):165–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2019.1636568
Weeden KA, Gelbgiser D, Morgan SL. (2020). Pipeline Dreams: Occupational Plans and Gender Differences in STEM Major Persistence and Completion. Sociol Educ. 93(4):297–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720928484
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.