Temporal Consistency Models for Financial Data Processing in Distributed Systems

Authors

  • Janardhan Reddy Chejarla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4967

Keywords:

Temporal Consistency, Causal Ordering, Distributed Ledgers, Deterministic Auditing, Asynchronous Message Processing

Abstract

For most distributed financial systems, the constraints imposed by the CAP (Consistency, Availability, Partition Tolerance) theorem must be reconciled against the ordering constraints needed to satisfy regulatory requirements and meet the performance requirements of real-time transaction processing. This paper presents the Temporal Sequence Barrier consistency model for asynchronous high-throughput ledger systems. Combining logical vector clocks with epoch-based orchestration patterns imposes a strict causal ordering of events across multiple geographic regions without sacrificing availability. Its database-centric architecture allows stateful routing and selective replication of entities in order to achieve linearizability of causally related transactions while allowing independent sets of entities to be processed in parallel. We provide a detailed evaluation that shows that we can provide causal consistency at latency bounds equal to or better than existing systems using clever buffering and adaptive timeouts, while also addressing the classic challenges in distributed transaction management and operator complexity.

References

[1] Leslie Lamport, "Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System", ACM, 1978. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/359545.359563

[2] Janardhan Reddy Chejarla, "A Novel Stateful Orchestration Pattern for Data Affinity and Transactional Integrity in Sharded Backend Architectures", Indian Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Jan.-Apr. 2026. Available: https://www.indjcst.com/archiver/archives/a_novel_stateful_orchestration_pattern_for_data_affinity_and_transactional_integrity_in_sharded_backend_architectures.pdf

[3] Martin Kleppmann, "Designing Data-Intensive Applications", O'Reilly, 2017. Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/designing-data-intensive-applications/9781491903063/

[4] Pat Helland, "Immutability Changes Everything", ACM, 2016. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/2844112

[5] Janardhan Reddy Chejarla, "Spring Batch Database-Backed Clustered Partitioning: A lightweight Coordination Framework for Distributed Job Execution", TechRxiv, Jul. 2025. Available: https://d197for5662m48.cloudfront.net/documents/publicationstatus/270851/preprint_pdf/498745eb5d16f1207c35b04c9e4f1d8f.pdf

[6] Daniel J. Abadi, "Consistency Tradeoffs in Modern Distributed Database System Design", IEEE Computer Society, 2012. Available: https://www.cs.umd.edu/~abadi/papers/abadi-pacelc.pdf

[7] Chris Richardson, "Microservices Patterns", O'Reilly, 2018. Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/microservices-patterns/9781617294549/

[8] Jeffrey Dean and Luiz André Barroso, "The Tail at Scale", ACM, 2013. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/2408776.2408794

[9] Kasun Indrasiri and Danesh Kuruppu, "gRPC: Up and Running", O'Reilly, 2020. Available: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/grpc-up-and/9781492058328/

[10] Diego Burgos et al. "Architectural Patterns for Data Pipelines in Digital Finance and Insurance Applications", Springer Nature, 2022. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-94590-9_3

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Janardhan Reddy Chejarla. (2026). Temporal Consistency Models for Financial Data Processing in Distributed Systems. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4967

Issue

Section

Research Article