Building Real-Time Pricing Systems for Modern Retail
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.4981Keywords:
Real Time Pricing Systems, Event-Driven Architecture, Hybrid Decision Making Frameworks, Price Elasticity Modeling, Pricing Governance and ComplianceAbstract
Real time pricing systems have become core operational systems in modern retail, enabling organizations to respond dynamically to market conditions while maintaining consistent prices across diverse customer touchpoints. This article examines and systematizes key architectural foundations, decision making frameworks, and governance mechanisms required to build scalable real time pricing engines in cloud native environments. The architectural discussion emphasizes layered system designs that separate concerns across data ingestion, processing, storage, and delivery, with particular attention to trade-offs between latency, consistency, and correctness in distributed retail pricing systems. A key contribution is the analysis of hybrid decision making frameworks that integrate rule based constraint layers with machine learning models for demand elasticity estimation. The rule based layer runs deterministic guardrails that include minimum margin requirements, regulatory compliance constraints, and brand positioning policies. The predictive models estimate price sensitivity across heterogeneous product portfolios and customer segments. This integration requires explicit orchestration mechanisms such as validation pipelines and approval workflows to balance operational efficiency against governance oversight. The real time processing architectures revisit event driven paradigms, where automation of evaluation workflows is triggered by incoming market signals such as competitor price changes or inventory depletions. This addresses critical challenges in latency optimization, cross channel price synchronization, and consistency management across geographically distributed infrastructure. The article examines frameworks for measuring financial outcomes and operational metrics and evaluates testing approaches used to validate pricing behavior under failure scenarios. Ethical considerations are addressed through an analysis of fairness and transparency in algorithmic pricing decisions, with an emphasis on mechanisms that foster consumer trust. The final aspect is risk control measures with audit mechanisms. This comprehensive treatment bridges data engineering principles, economic theory, and operational governance, providing practitioners with conceptual frameworks for designing pricing systems that balance competitive responsiveness with business integrity, customer trust, and regulatory compliance in an increasingly dynamic retail landscape. This article makes three contributions: (1) a reference architecture for cloud native real time pricing systems, (2) a hybrid decision framework integrating rule based constraints with machine learning models, and (3) a governance and risk management model addressing operational, ethical, and regulatory concerns.
References
[1] Wedad Elmaghraby & Pinar Keskinocak, "Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Inventory Considerations: Research Overview, Current Practices, and Future Directions," Management Science 49(10): 1287–1309, 2003. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220534328_Dynamic_Pricing_in_the_Presence_of_Inventory_Considerations_Research_Overview_Current_Practices_and_Future_Directions
[2] Vivek F. Farias & Benjamin Van Roy, "Dynamic Pricing with a Prior on Market Response," Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 1, 2010. Available: https://web.stanford.edu/~bvr/pubs/marketresponse.pdf
[3] Tyler Akidau et al., "The Dataflow Model: A Practical Approach to Balancing Correctness, Latency, and Cost in Massive-Scale, Unbounded, Out-of-Order Data Processing," Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 8, no. 12, August 2015. Available: https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol8/p1792-Akidau.pdf
[4] Pat Helland, "Data on the Outside versus Data on the Inside," Proceedings of the 2005 CIDR Conference, 2005. Available: https://www.cidrdb.org/cidr2005/papers/P12.pdf
[5] Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, "Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About," Annual Review of Economics, vol. 11, 2019. Available: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433
[6] Leo Breiman, "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures," Statistical Science, vol. 16, no. 3, August 2001. Available: https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistical-science/volume-16/issue-3/Statistical-Modeling--The-Two-Cultures-with-comments-and-a/10.1214/ss/1009213726.full
[7] Peter Alvaro et al., "Consistency Analysis in Bloom: a CALM and Collected Approach," Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), January 2011. Available: https://dsf.berkeley.edu/papers/cidr11-bloom.pdf
[8] Eric Brewer, "CAP Twelve Years Later: How the Rules Have Changed," IEEE Computer, vol. 45, no. 2, 2012. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6133253
[9] Moritz Hardt et al., "Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning," Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2016. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.02413
[10] Cynthia Dwork et al., "Fairness Through Awareness," Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS), 2012. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2090236.2090255
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.