Compliance-Native Architecture for Co-Branded Credit Card Platforms: A Multi-Party Financial Integration Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.5002Keywords:
Compliance-Native Architecture, Event Sourcing, Zero-Trust Systems, Cryptographic Auditability, AI-Augmented ComplianceAbstract
Enterprise financial systems supporting co-branded credit card programs must reconcile the fast pace of innovation with highly regulated PCI DSS, SOC 2, GDPR and FFIEC standards. Existing systems allow compliance testing to be a post-deployment pass/fail validator, introducing gaps while incurring the overhead of remediating violations discovered via compliance testing and audits. Architecture can be compliance-native, as when policy is a system primitive, enforced at runtime by policy engines, and recorded by event-sourced deterministic workflows and cryptographically verifiable logs. Attribute-based access control (ABAC) and declarative policy engines run millions of policy evaluations daily. Sub-millisecond latency is often required. Event sourcing saves all changes as unchangeable ordered sequences so that full audit reconstruction and regulatory explainability are possible. Zero-trust integration patterns establish cryptographic identity proofs and fine-grained trust boundaries across multi-party ecosystems. Large language models help compliance processes by automatically interpreting regulations and providing clear guidelines to make sure people oversee important decisions. Other features include cryptographically verifiable audit logs based on Merkle trees, which can be independently verified for regulatory purposes. The evidence shows that compliance requirements are enabling constraints and not obstacles in the way of velocity and adoption. These empirical deployments in global distributed systems have shown considerably reduced compliance overhead (while preserving the audit trail) and a faster verification cycle. Together with AI-assisted compliance layers and deterministic enforcement mechanisms, these technologies create the basis for scalable, trusted financial systems that turn post hoc requirements into architectural properties.
References
[1] Armin Berger et al., "Towards Automated Regulatory Compliance Verification in Financial Auditing with Large Language Models," arXiv, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.16642
[2] Olufunbi Babalola et al., "Policy framework for Cloud Computing: AI, governance, compliance and management," Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://gjeta.com/sites/default/files/GJETA-2024-0212.pdf
[3] Anne M. Tall and Cliff C. Zou, "A Framework for Attribute-Based Access Control in Processing Big Data with Multiple Sensitivities," MDPI, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/2/1183
[4] SRINIVAS PINISETTY et al., "Runtime Enforcement of Cyber-Physical Systems," ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3126500
[5] Oyejide Timothy Odofin1 et al., "Designing Event-Driven Architecture for Financial Systems Using Kafka, Camunda BPM, and Process Engines," International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bolaji-Adekunle/publication/392081813
[6] Vitor Enes et al., "Efficient Synchronization of State-based CRDTs," arXiv, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.02750
[7] C.Kanmani Pappa et al., "Zero-Trust Cryptographic Protocols and Differential Privacy Techniques for Scalable Secure Multi-Party Computation in Big Data Analytics," Journal of Electrical Systems, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/54c4/0c2c03bad677da5d97ba0035975be9bc4308.pdf
[8] Yangheran Piao et al., "A Data Sharing Scheme for GDPR-Compliance Based on Consortium Blockchain," MDPI, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/8/217
[9] Shabnam Hassani, "Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models," arXiv, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.17522?
[10] Zhenshan Bao et al., "An Auditable and Secure Model for Permissioned Blockchain," ACM, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3343147.3343170
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.