Limitations and Future Directions in Studying Organisational Justice in Academia: A Call for Longitudinal and Multivariate Approaches

Authors

  • Supriya CHALLA Koneru Lakshmiah Education Foundation
  • Sundari DADHABAI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.531

Keywords:

Organization justice , Job satisfaction, Leadership, Employee commitment, Interpersonal relationships

Abstract

This study delves into the complex dynamics of organizational justice within academic settings, acknowledging its significant role in shaping faculty perceptions and institutional effectiveness. Despite offering valuable insights, the study is constrained by its cross-sectional design, which limits the ability to infer causality. To address this limitation, future research should employ longitudinal designs, enabling the exploration of how perceptions of organisational justice evolve over time. Additionally, investigating other potential modifiers, such as organisational subcultures and individual differences, could provide a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding. Emphasizing these approaches will enhance the depth of knowledge regarding organisational justice, facilitating more effective strategies to foster fair and equitable academic environments.

Through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis of data from 276 MBA faculty members, the research identifies leadership behavior, organisational policies and procedures, and interpersonal relationships as key antecedents of organisational justice. The study further explores how these antecedents, through organizational justice, affect job satisfaction and organizational commitment, and how academic rank moderates these relationships.

References

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349).

Rand McNally.Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). Plenum.

Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (2000). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.

Pillai, R., Williams, E. S., & Tan, J. J. (2001). Are the scales tipped in favor of procedural or distributive justice? An investigation of the U.S., India, Germany, and Hong Kong (China). International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(4), 312-332.

Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

CHALLA, S., & Sundari DADHABAI. (2024). Limitations and Future Directions in Studying Organisational Justice in Academia: A Call for Longitudinal and Multivariate Approaches. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.531

Issue

Section

Research Article