Transforming Education with Industry 6.0: A Human-Centric Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.732Keywords:
Industry 6.0, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), Spatial Technology, Centric Technologies, Personalised LearningAbstract
This study investigates how Industry 6.0 technologies, including Artificial Intelligence AI, Augmented Reality AR, Virtual Reality VR, and the Internet of Things IoT, can transform the Indian education system in alignment with the National Education Policy NEP 2020. It focuses on addressing systemic challenges such as inequity, accessibility, and outdated teaching methodologies through technological integration. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on 28 peer-reviewed articles sourced from the Scopus database 2000-2024. Co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence mapping, and publication trend analysis were used to identify leading contributors, emerging trends, and research gaps. The analysis specifically examines India’s contributions to Industry 6.0 and its collaborative networks, particularly with the United States. The findings show that India leads in Industry 6.0 research, leveraging global partnerships to advance applications in education. Key technologies like AR and VR are found to enable immersive, interactive learning environments, while AI and IoT drive personalized and data-driven educational models. However, significant gaps remain, including limited empirical validation of outcomes, challenges in scaling technology to underserved regions, and persistent digital inequities. This study uniquely aligns Industry 6.0’s capabilities with NEP 2020 goals, offering a roadmap for integrating advanced technologies into education to improve inclusivity, engagement, and learning outcomes. It provides actionable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers to bridge identified gaps, positioning India as a global leader in educational innovation through Industry 6.0.
References
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2020). National Education Policy 2020 Ministry of Human Resource Development Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Chourasia, S., Tyagi, A., Pandey, S. M., Walia, R. S., & Murtaza, Q. (2022). Sustainability of Industry 6.0 in Global Perspective: Benefits and Challenges. MAPAN. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-022-00541-w
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2020). Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 69: 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842
Gupta, P. (2024, June 19). India’s AI Advancements in 7 Science Fields: Golden Age Yet to Come. Entrepreneur; Entrepreneur Media India. https://entrepreneur.com/en-in/news-and-trends/indias-ai-advancements-in-7-science-fields-golden-age-yet/475815
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. Rand.org; RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1365.html
Zainab Efe Egieya, Sarah Kuzankah Ewuga, Abimbola Oluwatoyin Adegbite, & Oke, T. (2023). The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality In Modern Marketing: A Critical Review. Computer Science & IT Research Journal. 4(3): 244–272. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v4i3.660.
Bhattacharya, B. (2022). Impact of AR and VR in Industrial Revolution. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 10(11): 732–736. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.47442
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment. 89(1): 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
Reeves, T. (2017, January 1). Book Review: Data Literacy for Educators: Making it Count in Teacher Preparation and Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314406692_Book_Review_Data_Literacy_for_Educators_Making_it_Count_in_Teacher_Preparation_and_Practice
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 83(2): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Pane, J., Steiner, E., Baird, M., Hamilton, L., & Pane, J. (2017). How Does Personalized Learning Affect Student Achievement? RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/rb9994
Almusaed, A., Yitmen, I., & Almssad, A. (2023). Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments. Sustainability. 15(18): 13464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813464
Ravindra Kumar Kushwaha, & Chandan Kumar Singh. (2023). Building Teacher Capacity for Inclusive Education: A Professional Development Model Using Technology and UDL. IJRAEL International Journal of Religion Education and Law. 2(2): 97–104. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijrael.v2i2.499
Mohammad Hadi Aliahmadi, Aminmasoud Bakhshi Movahed, Ali Bakhshi Movahed, Hamed Nozari, & Mahmonir Bayanati. (2024). Hospital 6.0 Components and Dimensions. Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics Book Series, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3108-8.ch004
Andrés Fernández-Miguel, García-Muiña, F. E., Davide Settembre-Blundo, Serena Chiara Tarantino, & Maria Pia Riccardi. (2024). Exploring Systemic Sustainability in Manufacturing: Geoanthropology’s Strategic Lens Shaping Industry 6.0. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-024-00404-0
Aminmasoud Bakhshi Movahed, Ali Bakhshi Movahed, & Hamed Nozari. (2024). Marketing 6.0 Conceptualization. Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics Book Series. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3108-8.ch002
Oskounejad, M. M., & Nozari, H. (2024). Advanced Businesses in Industry 6.0. In Advances in business information systems and analytics book series (pp. 88–90). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3108-8
Ali Bakhshi Movahed, Aminmasoud Bakhshi Movahed, Hamed Nozari, & Rahmaty, M. (2024). Security Criteria in Financial Systems in Industry 6.0. Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics Book Series. 62–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3108-8.ch005
Vetrivel, S. C., T. Gomathi, Sowmiya, K. C., & V. Sabareeshwari. (2024). Customer-Centric Excellence in the Marketing 6.0 Era. Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics Book Series. 192–219. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3108-8.ch013
Manjit, K., & Rajinder, K. (2024). AI and Influencer Marketing: Redefining the Future of Social Media Marketing in Industry 6.0 (pp. 87–103). IGI Global.
Digvijay, P., Balasubramani, S., Dhanalakshmi, R., Kavisankar, L., Ramesh, K., & Saritha, S. (2024). Revolutionizing Supply Chain With Machine Learning and Blockchain Integration. Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science. 113–125. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3593-2.ch008
Carayannis, E. G., Posselt, T., & Preissler, S. (2024). Toward Industry 6.0 and Society 6.0: The Quintuple Innovation Helix With Embedded AI Modalities As Enabler of Public Interest Technologies Strategic Technology Management and Road-Mapping. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2024.3406427
Dijkman, R. M., Sprenkels, B., Peeters, T., & Janssen, A. (2015). Business models for the Internet of Things. International Journal of Information Management. 35(6): 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.07.008
Melnyk, S. A., Ritchie, W., Stark, E. M., & Angela Langevin Heavey. (2023). When a dominant certified management standard is replaced: theoretical insights from the American hospital field. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-03-2022-0209
Batra, R., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Integrating Marketing Communications: New Findings, New Lessons, and New Ideas. Journal of Marketing. 80(6): 122–145. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0419
Davenport, T., Barth, P., & Bean, R. (2012). How “Big Data” is Different . https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/SMR-How-Big-Data-Is-Different_782ad61f-8e5f-4b1e-b79f-83f33c903455.pdf
McLean, B. L., & Borén, T. (2014). Barriers to implementing sustainability locally: a case study of policy immobilities. Local Environment. 20(12): 1489–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.909798
Kshetri, N. (2020). The evolution of cyber-insurance industry and market: An institutional analysis. Telecommunications Policy. 44(8): 102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102007
Osasona, F., Amoo, O. O., Atadoga, A., Abrahams, O., Farayola, O. A., & Samson, B. (2024). REVIEWING THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF AI IN DECISION MAKING PROCESSES. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. 6(2): 322–335. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773
Chae, B. (Kevin). (2015). Insights from hashtag #supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research. International Journal of Production Economics. 165: 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.037
Vial, G. (2019). Reflections on quality requirements for digital trace data in IS research. Decision Support Systems. 126: 113133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.113133
Marirajan Murugan, & Prabadevi, M. N. (2023). Impact of Industry 6.0 on MSME Entrepreneur’s Performance and Entrepreneur’s Emotional Intelligence in the Service Industry in India. RGSA: Revista de Gestão Social E Ambiental. 17(4): e03340–e03340. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n4-007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
