Comparative Analysis of Respiratory Monitoring Systems in Radiotherapy: Benchmarking RPM4D and DL4D Using a Novel Mobile Phantom

Authors

  • Songül Çavdar Karaçam Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
  • Ghada Almisned
  • Duygu Tunçman
  • Elif Kayhan
  • Ceren Barlas
  • Didem Çolpan Öksüz
  • H. Fazilet Öner Dinçbaş
  • H. Ozan Tekin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.751

Keywords:

Real-time Monitoring, CT, Radiotheraphy

Abstract

Respiratory monitoring systems are equipped with additional hardware such as cameras. However, one of the most developments is equipment for deviceless computed tomography (CT), that can monitor the patient’s respiratory phases and produce four-dimensional (4D) images without additional equipment. We investigated the determination of changes in target volume and critical structures in 4D images obtained with additional hardware (Real-Time Positioning Management System, RPM4D) and without additional hardware (Deviceless System, DL4D) from the CT. We evaluated their contribution to clinical use. Material and Methods: A mobile phantom was designed. Imaging was performed in the phantom under the same set-up conditions on both systems. The geometric discrepancy of gross tumour volume (GTV) and organs at risk(OAR) between RPM4D and DL4D images were evaluated. The assessment was based on the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and center of mass shift (COM) using both scanning protocols. The DSC for the right lung was 0.98, left lung 0.99, and tumour volume 0.92. Left and right lung displacement was up to 0.07 cm. It can be concluded thespatial overlaps were similar for both systems.

References

Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs J, Gerard J. -P, Hanks G, et al. ICRU Report 62: Prescribing,

Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 50). 1999;32(1):48-

,1999. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/os32.1.

Sprouts DA. Comparison of Device-Based and Deviceless 4DCT Reconstriction. San Diego State

University, San Diego, USA, M.S. thesis. 2017.

Bissonnette JP, Balter PA, Dong L, Langen KM, Lovelock M, Miften M, et al. Quality assurance

for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG-179.

Medical Physics.2012; 39(4): 1946-63. doi: 10.1118/1.3690466.

Brocka KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H and. Kessler ML.Use of image registration and fusion

algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task

Group No. 132. Medical Physics.2017; 44 (7): 43-76. doi: 10.1002/mp.12256.

Heinz C, Reiner M, Belka C, Walter F and Söhn M. Technical evaluation of different respiratory

monitoring systems used for 4D CT acquisition under free breathing. The Journal of Applied Clinical

Medical Physics.2015;16(2):491. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.4917.

Underberg RWM, Lagerwaard FJ, Slotman BJ,Cuijpers JP and Senan S. Use of maximum

intensity projections (MIP) for target volume generation in 4DCT scans for lung cancer. International

Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology – Physics.2005; 63(1):253-60. doi:

1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.045.

Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology.

;26(3):297–302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409.

Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM,Emery RS ,Forster KM, et al. The management of respiratory

motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76. Medical Physics.2006; 33(10): 3874-

doi: 10.1118/1.2349696.

Glide-Hurst CK, Schwenker SM, Ajlouni M and Chetty IJ.Evaluation of two synchronized

external surrogates for 4D CT sorting. The Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.2013;

(6):4301. doi:10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.430.

Li XA, Stepaniak C and Gore E. Technical and dosimetric aspects of respiratory gating using a

pressure‑sensor motion mon-itoring system. Medical Physics.2006; 33(1):145-54. doi:

1118/1.2147743.

Stine SK.Motion in radiotherapy: photon therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology.2012;

(23): R161-91. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/R161.

Moorrees J and Bezak E. Four dimensional CT imaging: a review of current technologies and

modalities. Physical and Engi-neering Sciences in Medicine.2012;35(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s13246-

-0124-6.

Yip CH. Comparison of external surrogate-based 4DCT and anatomy-based deviceless 4DCT for

stereotactic body radiation therapy.University of Hong Kong, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine

Department of Diagnostic and Clinical Oncology, China, M.S. thesis,2020.

Holla R, Khanna D, Barsing S, Bhaskaran KP and Ganesh T.Investigation of Internal Target

Volumes Using Device and Deviceless Four-dimensional Respiratory Monitoring Systems for

Moving Targets in Four-dimensional Computed Tomography Acquisition. Journal of Medical

Physics.2019;44(2):77–83. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_101_18.

Block A and Mewes A. Suggestion for an extended quality assurance in 4D CT and its function

in gated radiotherapy using a motion phantom. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical

Engineering, September, Munich, Germany;2009. pp.445-448.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-28

How to Cite

Çavdar Karaçam, S., Almisned, G., Tunçman, D., Kayhan, E., Barlas, C., Çolpan Öksüz, D., … Tekin, H. O. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Respiratory Monitoring Systems in Radiotherapy: Benchmarking RPM4D and DL4D Using a Novel Mobile Phantom. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.751

Issue

Section

Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)