Operational Research and Reconstruction Methods in Medical Imaging

Authors

  • PremaLatha Velagapalli Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
  • Nikhat Parveen Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
  • Velagapudi Sreenivas SRK Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1085

Keywords:

3D Reconstruction, Image Processing, Medical Image Processing

Abstract

With the widespread availability of 3D printing technology, there's potential to address the issue of printing replacement parts for broken objects. Traditional methods of 3D Printing will face a Challenge to replicate accurately for broken pieces, specifically for the fracture lines that can be complex for geometry. In this paper we discuss about a novel approach: Neural Network system which is optimized in Hybrid is designed for reconstructing 3D objects automatically such as toys, vessels, pots and medical related images. This process includes several key stages like acquisition of image, preprocessing, extraction of features, recognition, alignment and matching of fragments. First to eliminate noise from objects they are scanned by using preprocessing so that the data is clean for the input and forwarded for next step. To identify and quantify geometric feature we use extraction of feature, texture characteristics, fragments of boundaries and edges are also extracted. In next stage we try to determine placement of fragments that are broken within the object in the system to match accordingly. A function of fitness which is hybrid uses techniques like optimization to align and fit for fragments to improve accuracy.

Author Biographies

Nikhat Parveen, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation

She working as Associate Professor in Computer Science and Engineering department

Velagapudi Sreenivas, SRK Institute of Technology

He is working as professor in Computer Science and Engineering Department.

References

BastosFilho, C.J., de Lima Neto, F.B., Lins, A.J., Nascimento, A.I. and Lima, M.P., 2008, October. A novel search algorithm based on fish school behavior. In 2008 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (pp. 2646-2651). IEEE

3D Reconstruction of Medical Images- [Smith, J., Patel, R., Zhang, L.]-2010

Sparse MRI Reconstruction using Constrained Total Variation- [Otazo, R., Kim, D., Axel, L.]2011

Joint Motion Estimation and Image Reconstruction in Dynamic MRI- [Lingala, S.G., Hu, Y., DiBella, E.V.R.]-2012

Dynamic 3D Ultrasound Reconstruction using Sparse Representation- [Wang, Y., Dong, F., Lian, Z.]-2013

Fast 3D CT Reconstruction using GPU Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction- [Chen, H., Zhang, J., Wang, Q.]-2014

Robust 3D Reconstruction of Cardiac Structures from MRI- [Zhu, Y., Shi, F., Zhan, Y., Deng, B.]-2015

Deep Learning for PET Image Reconstruction- [Chen, K., Gong, K., Guo, J., Feng, H.]-2016

Choy, C.B., Xu, D., Gwak, J., Chen, K. and Savarese, S., 2016, October. 3d-r2n2: A unified approach for single and multi-view 3d object reconstruction. In European conference on computer vision (pp. 628-644). Springer, Cham.

Texture Mapping for 3D Reconstruction of Brain Tumors from MRI- [Sarkar, S., Arbel, T., Cohen-Adad, J.]-2017

Sparse-View CT Reconstruction for Low-Dose Imaging- [Xiao, G., Zhang, X., Ma, J., Zhang, Y.]-2018

Paschalidou, Despoina, Osman Ulusoy, Carolin Schmitt, Luc Van Gool, and Andreas Geiger. Raynet: Learning volumetric 3d reconstruction with ray potentials. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3897-3906. 2018

Paschalidou, Despoina, Osman Ulusoy, Carolin Schmitt, Luc Van Gool, and Andreas Geiger. Raynet: Learning volumetric 3d reconstruction with ray potentials. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3897-3906. 2018.

Zollhöfer, Michael, Patrick Stotko, Andreas Görlitz, Christian Theobalt, Matthias Nießner, Reinhard Klein, and Andreas Kolb. State of the art on 3D reconstruction with RGB‐D cameras. In Computer graphics forum, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 625-652. 2018

Zhou, Yi, Guillermo Gallego, Henri Rebecq, Laurent Kneip, Hongdong Li, and DavideScaramuzza. Semi-dense 3D reconstruction with a stereo event camera. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp. 235-251. 2018

Fu, Yanping, Qingan Yan, Long Yang, Jie Liao, and Chunxia Xiao. Texture mapping for 3d reconstruction with rgb-d sensor. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 4645-4653. 2018.

Kölling, Tobias, Tobias Zinner, and Bernhard Mayer. Aircraft-based stereographic reconstruction of 3-D cloud geometry. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 12, no. 2 (2019): 1155-1166.

Popescu, Cosmin, BjörnTäljsten, Thomas Blanksvärd, and LennartElfgren. 3D reconstruction of existing concrete bridges using optical methods. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 15, no. 7 (2019): 912-924.

Aharchi, M., and M. Ait Kbir. A review on 3D reconstruction techniques from 2D images. In The Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Smart City Applications, pp. 510-522. Springer, Cham, 2019.

Kunwar, Saket, Hongyu Chen, Manhui Lin, Hongyan Zhang, Pablo D’Angelo, Daniele Cerra, Seyed Majid Azimi et al. Large-scale semantic 3-D reconstruction: Outcome of the 2019 IEEE GRSS data fusion contest—Part A. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied

PremaLatha Velagapalli, Nikhat Parveen “Adaptive fish school search optimized resnet for multi-view 3d object reconstruction” Multimedia Tools and Applications (2024).

Xie, Haozhe, Hongxun Yao, Xiaoshuai Sun, Shangchen Zhou, and Shengping Zhang. Pix2vox: Context-aware 3d reconstruction from single and multi-view images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 2690-2698. 2019.

Ma, Xinzhu, Zhihui Wang, Haojie Li, Pengbo Zhang, Wanli Ouyang, and Xin Fan. Accurate monocular 3d object detection via color-embedded 3d reconstruction for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6851-6860. 2019

Xu, Haonan, JunyiHou, Lei Yu, and ShuminFei. 3D Reconstruction system for collaborative scanning based on multiple RGB-D cameras. Pattern Recognition Letters 128 (2019): 505-512.

Mahmoudzadeh A, Golroo A, Jahanshahi MR, FirooziYeganeh S. Estimating Pavement Roughness by Fusing Color and Depth Data Obtained from an Inexpensive RGB-D Sensor. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 6; 19(7):1655. doi: 10.3390/s19071655. PMID: 30959936; PMCID: PMC6479490.

Noise Reduction in 3D Ultrasound Reconstruction using Deep Learning- [Wu, Y., Chen, X., Li, S., Yang, J.]-2019

Transparent Object 3D Reconstruction using Endoscopic Imaging- [Li, W., Liu, Y., Huang, X., Yang, L.]-2020

Real-Time 3D Reconstruction of Surgical Scenes from Endoscopic Videos- [Zhang, H., Wang, J., Li, H., Zhang, Y.]-2021

Accurate and Efficient MRI Reconstruction using Deep Cascade Networks- [Gong, Y., Li, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, S.]-2022

Dynamic 3D CT Reconstruction for Respiratory Motion Correction- [Chen, Z., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Chen, Y.]-2023

Maken, Payal, and Abhishek Gupta. 2D-to-3D: A Review for Computational 3D Image Reconstruction from x-ray Images. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 30, no. 1 (2023): 85-114.

Ronchi, Diego, Marco Limongiello, Emanuel Demetrescu, and Daniele Ferdani. Multispectral UAV Data and GPR Survey for Archeological Anomaly Detection Supporting 3D Reconstruction. Sensors 23, no. 5 (2023): 2769.

Renzi, Francesca, Christian Vergara, Marco Fedele, Vincenzo Giambruno, AlfioQuarteroni, Giovanni Puppini, and Giovanni Battista Luciani. Accurate and Efficient 3D Reconstruction of Right Heart Shape and Motion from Multi-Series Cine-MRI. bioRxiv (2023): 2023-06.

Learning to Reconstruct 3D Breast MRI from Sparse Views- [Liu, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Chen, H.]-2024.

S, M., D, V., & G, S. (2025). Advanced Liver Tumour Detection Using Optimized YOLOv8 Modules. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1613

Bandla Raghuramaiah, & Suresh Chittineni. (2025). BCDNet: An Enhanced Convolutional Neural Network in Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammogram Images. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.811

Gonthina, N., & L.V. Narasimha Prasad. (2025). Semantic Segmentation of Satellite Images using 2 various U-Net Architectures: A Comparison Study. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1360

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

How to Cite

Velagapalli, P., Parveen, N., & Velagapudi Sreenivas. (2025). Operational Research and Reconstruction Methods in Medical Imaging. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.1085

Issue

Section

Research Article