The Impact of Leadership Practices on Employee Job Satisfaction

Authors

  • Zhang TINGTING
  • Oyyappan DURAIPANDI
  • Li SHIGANG
  • Liu ZHE
  • Yu JUN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3748

Keywords:

Transformational leadership, Transactional Leadership, Servant Leadership, Decision-Making, Retention

Abstract

Many corporate environments still heavily rely on leadership, which influences employee degree of work satisfaction. The aim of this study is to explore the ways in which the leadership behaviours are connected to engagement, retention, and motivation as well as to identify the ones that most affect workers' level of happiness. Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and servant leadership are some of the leadership theories under central focus of the research. Currently, they are looking at the relationships between these ideas and important results in the workplace including trust in management, recognition, and chances for professional development. Data also came from organized interviews with employees and organizational leaders. This was done while gathering data from staff comments and internal performance reports. The results show that employees who value empathy, openness, cooperative decision-making, and consistent recognition in leadership are more likely to be satisfied with their whole experience. This is the contrary of what was before thought. Significant modifiers in this relationship were discovered to be the workforce's demographics, the kind of industry, and the corporate culture. Leadership styles that are inclusive and flexible have shown to have a more major and beneficial influence on employee satisfaction.
Considering the results, it is likely that a deliberate strategy to improve leadership conduct can provide higher degrees of work satisfaction and production. Organizational alignment with employee values, opportunities for leadership development, and an emphasis on employee feedback systems are among the several elements that can possibly intensify this effect. This study adds to the current conversation on organizational behaviour by providing evidence-based recommendations meant to improve leadership and human resource management in many kinds of business environments.

References

[1] Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2024). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership.

[2] Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2024). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement.

[3] Cavazotte, F., Moreno, V., & Hickmann, M. (2022). Effects of leader intelligence, personality and emotional intelligence on transformational leadership and managerial performance.

[4] Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2022). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.

[5] Goleman, D. (2023). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ.

[6] Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2022). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years.

[7] Greenleaf, R. K. (2021). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness.

[8] Hofstede, G. (2021). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd Ed.).

[9] Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2023). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment.

[10] Madlock, P. E. (2023). The link between leadership style, communicator competence, and employee satisfaction.

[11] Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2021). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviour in primary schools: The Tanzanian case.

[12] Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2023). A socially Embedded model of thriving at work. Organization science.

[13] Sutanto, H., Utami, Y., & Diantoro, A. K. (2021). The Effect of Idealized Influence, Inspirational Motivation, Intellectual Stimulation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v1i3.293

[14] Syakur A., Susilo T. A. B., Wike W., Ahmadi R. (2021). Sustainability of communication, Organizational culture, cooperation, trust and leadership style for lecturer commitments in Higher education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.980

[15] Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2021). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure.

[16] Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2020). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: practice and research.

[17] Yukl, L., (2023). Leadership in organizations. New York, NY: Pearson.

[18] Zeleke, B., & Obang, P. (2021). The Relationship between Leadership Styles and Employees' Job Satisfaction at Gambella Teachers' Education & Health Science College. The Ethiopian Journal of Education.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Zhang TINGTING, Oyyappan DURAIPANDI, Li SHIGANG, Liu ZHE, & Yu JUN. (2024). The Impact of Leadership Practices on Employee Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3748

Issue

Section

Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>